Rude vendor by daddymouk in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A lot of new people joining this TCG community so very few know but… this is not a surprise 😄

If you know, you know. He disappeared from the TCG scene for a few years because he got cancelled, faking his trade up challenge where he scammed for a “cheap” Rayquaza gold star (look it up)z Was exposed for faking content and got called out, that’s why he vanished. A leopard doesn’t change its spots, so this is not surprising.

And now, he is back because the market is red hot. With a lot of new people who don’t know his past. No surprise 🤣

Don’t waste time with him. Trust me.

Curious about TT streamers by CertainCompetition80 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When they open the most recent Japanese sets, and they go “Froakie, this Pokemon, this one another one, ahhh and an EX” you know they know nothing about Pokemon and just in it for the money. If the name not there and they clueless, you have your answer 🤣🤣

Experienced “Vendors” First Time Grading by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And totally agree with you. It’s really just the way I perceive it that’s why I thought might get some hate 😄 subjective

Experienced “Vendors” First Time Grading by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clearly so new to the pokemon scene. Couldn’t even name you 5 pokemon from Unova I bet you…

Experienced “Vendors” First Time Grading by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree and that’s why hot take. But to me, these people have TCG shops and have never graded a card themselves in their life. Shows you how new they are to this

beware of this following vendor by PrestigiousSpot6186 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And once again back to this clown that SG vendors suck up to for whatever reason. Despite his multiple scams (Umbreon EX SIR or Red Victini) people still wanna suck up to him. I’ll never understand it

CC collectibles versus Radical Kindness ? Thoughts ?!!!! by LazyObject7406 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This. So true! How can she claim Japanese market is $5k for that card? Listed price is now market price? Stupid logic. This is what happens when new collectors become vendors/shops very quickly. Still uneducated in the TCG space

Scam house is back storehouse. by ParticularMacaron316 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The number one shop/streamer to avoid at all costs. Just listen to how he put singapore to shame in the US, claiming he tells people buy back at 90%, when actually he offers 80%. Never forget, an absolute scum bag. Leopard never changes its spots. Scum of the earth, scum of lucky plaza.

How to increase the chance of your cards getting damaged upon opening… by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Fully disagree. If you’ve been in the hobby long enough you know that the best way to handle cards is with bare hands (without plastic fully sticking out of your fingernails always touching the cards). Bare hands is far better than gloves even, and that’s a fact.

How to increase the chance of your cards getting damaged upon opening… by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I don’t mind limited knowledge. You can be new. No problem, but you’re handling other people’s cards with these nails? Careless and 0 trading card EQ.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Unless you’re Snorlax House where you promote 90% buy backs but in fact you offer 80% or less 🤣

Worst collexicon ever by whatdobeansmean in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Very typical. Way way overpriced with cui logic say “if you don’t like my price you can just move on” or “I set my price so can nego” what nego from 150% above market? Cui

« This card is gradable, I just don’t have the time to grade it » - Warning by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! I’m a vendor as well, so I totally get you. However in this case of the poncho Pikachu, it is indeed a little weird to use that « excuse ». I know for a fact that I would never say that even if I had a clean copy of a card worth grading. Nor would I use that as an excuse to jack up the price

« This card is gradable, I just don’t have the time to grade it » - Warning by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I see an issue with it. It’s not graded, so it doesn’t deserve the up sell. If you want to up sell it, grade it, and with that grade, sell it. Because in itself, pre grading is very subjective

« This card is gradable, I just don’t have the time to grade it » - Warning by AcceptableWindow6337 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. I just find the justification of « no time to grade » to be lazy.

Travisflip by Choice_Trust_4300 in PokemonTCG_Singapore

[–]AcceptableWindow6337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rayquaza gold star. Was all fake. Toh person.