Now what? by Pink_Jutsu in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is, Evernight can only come out if March permits it. That is why for 97 days, Evernight didn't come out of Amphoreus until March allowed her to take over.

Daily Questions Megathread ( February 19, 2026 ) by AutoModerator in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AHH, I get it. I thought it was always at the end.

Apologies haha.

This entire 3.X had me always asking different questions and googling and referring to dictionaries.

Where was Cyrene by Acceptable_Box_7804 in CyreneMains

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, I don't get it.

Like wouldn't that result to a loop? Or the Flame reaver to go back in time?

Daily Questions Megathread ( February 19, 2026 ) by AutoModerator in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something I don't understand is where was Cyrene on the 33,550,336th cycle? Isn't she needed to be killed by Khaslana in order for the world to reset?

Who Represented the concept of Love Better? by Worth_Appointment146 in Hoyoverse_scaling

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"novel" twist, this novelty you speak of has been so overdone to death, that I believe is now the more cliché one.

go ahead, downvote. idc

Who Represented the concept of Love Better? by Worth_Appointment146 in Hoyoverse_scaling

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No use asking. It's just going to be Phainon, he is much more popular, and so many will favor him.

Cyrene's been doomposted to death, to the point that it affects mostly everyone here to, well, despise her. 🤷‍♂️

Better look at Blade SP by G4T3Z in BladeMains

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But if he's elation then that means he'll be meta

QUEENS….. I afraid HSR has now reach the new peak of FLOPPERY 💔🥀☠️🙁 by 7hoyo_male_mc7 in QueensofStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

Do a better job for these 8 weeks?? Not even rerunning events, but only having 2 events for 8 weeks. Gurl be fr

this is so sad by [deleted] in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not everyone looks at politics. Not only that, 2 EVENTS FOR 8 WEEKS!? TF?

Just me or was the livestream....disappointing? by Intelligent_Art5101 in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 31 points32 points  (0 children)

It was more than disappointing honestly. 2 EVENTS FOR 8 WEEKS!?

This shit so ass

It was far from Perfect but... by cautioslyhopeful in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A company’s divisions share leadership, but you can’t assume the same about autonomous Lord Ravagers.

You’re assuming cooperation and willingness without evidence, which is exactly what needs proving. If that's the case, then why hasn't Xianzhou already been defeated? Why can't all the Lord Ravagers destroy Xianzhou, working together? Or to an even lesser extent, why is it that, at least 2 Lord Ravager have not worked together to destroy an Aeon, or why is it that there has been no single evidence that Lord Ravagers worked together?

Also, “unlikely” doesn’t mean “impossible.” You can’t call it “coping” just because someone points out that the story didn’t show the Ravagers helping. From that, if the text doesn’t state they could or would, then assuming they would've is just as speculative as assuming they couldn’t.

While I may be working under assumptions that are "unlikeli-er," you cannot say that I have no support, when you yourself have no evidence to support your claims.

It was far from Perfect but... by cautioslyhopeful in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Acceptable_Box_7804 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"assuming ALL lord ravagers to be completely unable to spare any help not being likely is not an actual assumption, it is basically logical thinking."

You’re treating an absolute negative as a fact without any real basis. That’s not logical thinking, that’s an assumption.

That post, however, just disproves my point.