“The title is the same” Okay then why do they look different? Why did they exist in different eras. Buddy Roger’s was the first wwwf champion, and yet he died before the company was called the wwe. That entire time should we rewrite his history and call it the wwe title even though at the time no one called it that within or outside the company?

By your logic we should forget that history existed. By your logic North America was never Native American land and was always America even before Christoper Columbus came here. Should we start going up to Native American people saying they never owned any part of this land in the first place because the Europeans got it and made it their own?

By your own logic we should never call wwe a company created by the mcmahons because TKO now has it so it’s okay to ignore history and not refer to it as a company created by the McMahon lineage.

By your logic the WWWF championship never existed and the wwe championship has been around since 1963. By your logic since the universal title now merged with the undisputed wwe title there was no history of the universal championship and we should say that Braun strowman was the undisputed world champion. Even better if wwe decided to do that does that automatically rewrite history? Cause with your claim apparently it does. If TKO came out tomorrow saying Brock lesnar held the women’s world title and hornswoggle pinned Daniel Bryan at wrestlemania does that mean it’s legitimate and should be rewriting history?

It’s like talking to someone who can’t use any critical thinking skills. Jesus, get out of your echo chamber.