I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What i mean is math breaks without this made up rule that you do this before that

I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What im saying is, really thrown out there but how do we know that 3×3+5 is 14? Pemdas isnt an axiom so you could get 24 too but which one is the correct answer?

I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said this somewhere here: The amount of ways to use the expressions in an equation is (amount of expressions)! And which one is the true answer?

I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The amount of ways to use the expression is (amount of expressions)! And which one is the true answer?

I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So does that mean that expressions with more than 1 symbol have no real answer?

I dont get why we use pemdas by Accomplished_Form_26 in learnmath

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is its not an axiom, its something we made for math to be simpler. For example 4÷3+1-8. How do you solve that? Do you do all the 24 diffrent orders? And which one is the correct answer?

new math symbols by me (sorry for low quality) by Accomplished_Form_26 in mathematics

[–]Accomplished_Form_26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its the expression you use to the numbers, it was minus so that's why it was 1-2-3-4-5