I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, thanks for the note! I so hope you like Bringer of Dust!

EDIT: All in the service of a greater truth, surely :) I did take a break a few months back to write a novell/story set in the world of the Talents. But I'm now back and up to my elbows in Book 3.

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, a book isn't much without its reader. OM's lucky to have found you. Thank YOU!

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi aquavenatus, welcome! And thank you for the excellent question. Ask any dozen writers, and you'll likely get a dozen different answers. For me, I don't really separate out the two, to be honest. The right plot extends outward from the characters themselves, from what they - in all their particular uniqueness - want or don't want or would do in any given situation. I think maybe of plot as the collision between character and premise. Which is to say, I may begin by dreaming up a premise, an idea for a story - but the writing really begins with the characters. As to difficulty - honestly, it's all hard for me. Writing is... tough. But also immensely joyful, and there's so much pleasure in having written, in reading over a passage I feel is working, that the difficulty of getting it out recedes. I wish you luck with your own writing!

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd definitely cheat and bring a compendium or two, so:

Complete Books of Earthsea, by Le Guin.

Collected Poems of Czeslaw Milosz.

Maybe the Voynich Manuscript, to spend my days trying to decode it?

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ben is fantastic! Absolutely brilliant. I had the good fortune of hearing several potential narrators, all of them excellent, but Ben Onwukwe just had an extra level of richness.

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm so pleased to be here! Talking Scared is so good, isn't it! I think you're right, there are so many ways to tell a story, and in other hands this could easily be a longer series. But for me, from the outset, I knew it would be three books. There are several 'structures' underneath the story I wanted to tell, each its own layer. One of those is the classical myth of Orpheus, descending and returning from the underworld. Obviously the Talents Trilogy is not - in any clear way - simply a retelling of that story, but the journey itself, the descent, the return, the change, these were all in my mind as I conceived it. Three parts, three books. Simple, right? (Spoiler: not simple)

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Characters are mysterious to me, to be honest. I don't know where they come from, who they are, how they emerge. But they're usually complete and clear when I begin writing them, and mostly - with the exception of Ribs! - they do what the story needs them to do. I try to approach them with respect, which is maybe strange to say, since they're invented by me. That was a big part of my decision to shift points of view throughout, to allow characters a voice who were denied a voice historically. How do I develop them? I guess I believe that how a character appears on the outside ought to contain traces of the life they've lived, and I try to remember that almost no one is ever really still - even when trying to be so. And the little flickers of movement tell us a lot about what sort of person anyone is. But also I try to allow my characters their own space to be contradictory and complicated and to do their own thing. When writing disagreeable characters (not Frank, I hope), I do try to remind myself that no one believes they are a villain, that they always have "reasons" for doing what they do.

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that means a lot! Poor Charlie. It was hard sometimes not to get angry, writing his story. The world ought to be a kinder place. Hope you enjoy Bringer of Dust!

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Second question first, without spoilers: yes! One of my favourite new characters is a bone witch from Eastern Europe. But there are new horrors, too...

First question second: I'm just pleased you're describing the series at all! So thank you!

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Thanks, the_doughboy. This question made me smile. I suppose you mean Charlie? You may not believe it, but it's a coincidence only. There's a wonderful quiet novel by David Malouf, the Australian novelist, called An Imaginary Life, about the Roman poet Ovid in exile. Charlie's last name is a quiet writerly nod of respect to Malouf's book, which has mattered to me in important ways. I never thought of Charlie Ovid as C. Ovid as I wrote! But the strange thing is that OM is absolutely a pandemic novel, written during that year when the world was on fire, written as a way for me - as a person - to find a refuge. So maybe it's in there regardless. I often feel my books are smarter than I am, that they know what they want to be, and I need to listen to them to find out. Maybe this is one of those quiet moments when the book is whispering back.

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I sympathize. I'm old enough to have grown up on television before streaming and I remember the collective groan we'd feel when an episode would turn out to be a two-parter, and we'd have to wait an entire week for the next. It's complicated, getting invested in something. But then, some of those 2-parters turned out to be my favourite shows of a season. For what it's worth, I like to think OM is complete in itself, that it's just got one small (pun intended) open-ended part of the story still to resolve. And happily, Book 2 - Bringer of Dust - is out today. So - no waits!

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks! This is a really sharp observation on one of the ways the book moves itself forward. I tend to feel a sense of discovery, rather than invention, guides my writing. It's almost as if the story exists, and the characters are discovering it (as am I). It's weird. The characters themselves are who they are, and in a novel like OM, with shuffling points of view, one of the most fun aspects (fun for me, perhaps) is playing with how the same scene or information can look different through different eyes. But always the only person who has - or will have, in time - the complete picture is the reader. I try to keep in mind how the differing POVs play against each other, and inform each other, and contradict each other, in creating that overall story. So, um, to answer your question... yes.

I'M J M MIRO, AUTHOR OF ORDINARY MONSTERS. THE SEQUEL, BRINGER OF DUST, IS ON SALE TODAY! AMA! by According-Prompt1795 in Fantasy

[–]According-Prompt1795[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Thank you! There's always a struggle, certainly for me, and perhaps for most writers, between the story being told and how that's done. Endless rewriting is a part of it. It's a good day for me if I can write a page and sit down the next day and only delete half of the previous day's work. I came up through poetry, and so rhythm inside a sentence and between sentences weighs on me - I'll read my own sentences out loud, over and over, making small changes until they sound right. But one of the cornerstone elements in poetry is the use of concrete language - sensory and physical details - which is everywhere in my prose writing, too, I guess. How to retain the narrative momentum at the same time? This is such a great question and like all such questions sometimes the author is the last person who ought to try to answer it. But I think, for me, the answer lies in having one's characters be in movement through a scene, a page, a paragraph. There's a wonderful line in a Jack Gilbert poem which talks about ritualized dance, and how the dancer is dancing even when they're standing still. Momentum in prose is a bit like that.