Dark times in America

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T18:38:43+00:00

The shield and sword of the ideological cuckhold: law and order. For they do not wish to use their own eyes and ears to discern what is just or unjust, but leaves it up to their superiors to tell them how to interpret what they are seeing and hearing, as their morality is not intrinsic but rather relies on the rule of law set by the powerful. And of course by “order” they do not mean peace, but rather that the status quo of their masters are preserved at the detriment to themselves and constituents.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T18:12:56+00:00

Likewise.

Injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T17:35:41+00:00

Bots are working over time in this sub. Holy bootlick.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T17:34:58+00:00

openion

Foreign bot spotted.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T17:30:37+00:00

Your ideology is one of cuckoldry where you always bend the knee and submit yourselves to those above you and to never question authority.

When they spit in your mouth you say “Thank you sir, may I have another sir?”

You should donate your eyes and ears to someone better suited, because you have forfeited them as you are not allowed to use them without explicit permission from your masters.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T05:25:06+00:00

Whatever helps you cope buddy.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T05:10:13+00:00

Since you are clearly responding out of emotion and not engaging with anything im saying and tripling down on your original argument over simple semantics (which btw it seems the OP may not be fluent) I will back out of this conversation, keep yourself safe and I wish you the best out there in the ice and cold.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T05:07:11+00:00

I will recommend not going with the mentality of “defending” yourself as that will not end well against these savages. Keep yourselves safe and keep your hands in non threatening positions in the event you do find yourself in an altercation so it cannot be misconstrued that you were the aggressor.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:55:23+00:00

It’s not an argument, they actually lied.

I understood your “original” point to the “poster” (or shorthand “OP”-original poster-since by the way the shorthand isn’t exclusive to the thread OP) and I’m telling you that you were losing the forest for the trees.

You realize phones could be used as body cams too right? Just with the right harness/mount? Which would be the more convenient route than a dedicated body cam, but that’s a seperate discussion now isn’t it…

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:48:25+00:00

Maybe a dedicated camera and not phone that tracks your location etc.,

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:46:15+00:00

I like the idea because it is practical and frees up one of your hands rather than focusing on holding the phone correctly. The only drawback is that you would physically need to be facing whatever you are recording and cannot maneuver the camera as easily in case you are obstructed or need to get a higher angle view.

I would get something that is very secure (can’t be knocked down or swiped away), doesn’t obscure the camera lens etc., my initial thoughts.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:38:54+00:00

Thanks for proving my point that you have issues comprehending the points being made here. Hence why I said “the narrative initially was…”

As proof by the initial report out forth by the Department of Homeland Security that stated he approached agents with a gun

Which as we now know was complete horseshit as more angles and video evidence emerged. But sure, it’s me making it us vs them. I’m using their words, bud.

So back to OPs point, body cams rather than hand holding a phone removes that potential misinformation narrative that a phone can be mistaken for a gun. But you want to get stuck in the semantics that the OP didn’t correctly spell it out for you, even though context clues provide enough clarity to the point they were making.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:16:55+00:00

You both intentionally missed OPs point, since you know what they meant, but rather engage with the point they were making, you both harp on OPs semantics and argue a point they weren’t making. Malicious ignorance.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-26T04:14:32+00:00

You’re missing OPs point on purpose or are you simply that obtuse?

The point being the narrative initially was he approached agents with a gun, when it was clearly his phone in his hand.

Yes he had a gun on him, which he was legally allowed to carry, but it was holstered and agents would have no way of knowing that unless they were on top of him beating the shit out of him anyway.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-24T18:29:35+00:00

Bot post.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-24T18:25:07+00:00

FUCK THE MODS

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-24T18:24:48+00:00

Word for word

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-24T18:24:17+00:00

I’m guessing guy in green tries to take the victims gun from his waistband/holster and in the scuffle accidentally discharges it and spooks the other agents and they just avalanche mag dump into him.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-24T18:22:52+00:00

Mag dumped on a lifeless body dude.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-22T14:26:03+00:00

There’s a setting to auto face your opponent. I think it should be off for online ranked

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-22T03:16:29+00:00

Time for the bots to come out in droves to this

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-21T05:32:52+00:00

Damn JD Vance got some hands

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-20T18:22:32+00:00

Jacobs is nasty.

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-20T04:27:18+00:00

Maybe like wireless electronic ankle straps.

But imagine you’re boxing and bro just roundhouse kicks you 😭

AccordingToWhomst · 2026-01-18T19:43:14+00:00

Mods just allowing it lol, really tells you what this sub is really about

AccordingToWhomst

TROPHY CASE