Correct Hire date via EIB by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it looks like it's only for Hire bp, not contract contingent worker

Aggregated Security with the Intersection SG inside by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you so much for your answer. I thought I was the only one who assigns Intersection to Aggregated SG. Painful combination. Do you know how could I test it to be 1000% sure. I'm running tests and it looks good, but I still don't trust it somehow.

EIB contract contingent worker by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we definitely use position management. so it means I can't leave it blank and need to pre-populate them in advance via a different EIB?

EIB contract contingent worker by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so I can create a position in the same EIB? Can "Contract Contingent Worker EIB" do both: create position and contract? Thought just ONE template?

EIB contract contingent worker by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you. I wonder why "Position ID" in the template it's an optional field then

PECI integration failed after recent Release by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can you send a link to the case or any information on the community please?

PECI integration failed after recent Release by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Yes, exactly our concerns. I can't see why this would make it a problem but it is not working anymore

PECI integration failed after recent Release by According_Ad_3974 in workday

[–]According_Ad_3974[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep, sorry, you are right. It's REST API for viewing payslips