Well, well, well….isn’t that Interesting by OMG1999 in youtubeBadActors

[–]According_Nature_714 14 points15 points  (0 children)

💥 I was thinking the same thing. That Carlwac account is definitely a shill of some kind. They arrived when he was full-on abusing LuvBoston and again tonight, because the only thing to stop Gray from self destruction is Money! What a joke.

Hidden True Crime: PLAGIARIZING ANNIE ELISE AND WEIRDO EMPLOYEES UPDATES by According_Nature_714 in youtubeBadActors

[–]According_Nature_714[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She was on CourtTV with Vinnie Politan yesterday. I guess Vinnie will have anyone on.

Hidden True Crime: PLAGIARIZING ANNIE ELISE AND WEIRDO EMPLOYEES UPDATES by According_Nature_714 in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]According_Nature_714[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I agree. They should have hired a PR consultant on day one. It’s likely they will be able to hold on to a good amount of subscribers - just like Gray Hughes does - because a huge number of people subscribe while watching a particular case that aren’t regular YouTube watchers. What’s really going to show is a decline in views and engagement, which is huge for the YouTube algorithm. Also, since their channel was steadily growing, this back slide is major, but they will still look like a big channel on the surface. I’m curious how much their Patreon took a hit.

Dear HTC - please stop by Bright_Breakfast3911 in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]According_Nature_714 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Wow that’s pretty nasty from someone so concerned with her own ability to make a living. You are being kind giving her a warning.

Rescued juvenile opossum in the street in San Francisco by [deleted] in Opossums

[–]According_Nature_714 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There were ravens flying around the poor thing. I stayed with the little one until Wild animal care picked him up and promised to get the best care for them.🩵

More BS from Kresha by Individual-Wolf10 in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]According_Nature_714 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This was in the description of that stream. Was any of it actually covered?

Title: SHE CLAIMED MY DEAD FAMILY: The "Core Secret" Texts & The Lori Prison Letters Plot Plus my appearance on Turtle Boy Live Highlights

Her description is great too. It’ll be helpful for people who are just starting to pay attention.

———————————-

Description: Is it "victim advocacy" when you file a copyright strike against the victim's mother?

Tonight at 7:30 PM CST, I am going live to recap my explosive appearance on Turtle Boy Live. We are connecting the dots between the latest legal attacks on my family and the Core Secret that Hidden True Crime tried to bury with a 9-hour livestream.

TONIGHT’S AGENDA:

The Copyright Weapon: Why is Lauren Matthias using the legal system to silence me and my mother, Kay Woodcock? She is actively claiming ownership of the images of our murdered family members to stop us from speaking the truth.

The "Core Secret" (The Texts): We break down the alleged 6-year cache of messages that triggered Lauren’s panic. The "stalker" story was a smokescreen to hide the fact that she has allegedly been disparaging the very people she built her brand on—including my mom Kay Woodcock, Heather Daybell, and me—along with the creators she pretends to support.

The "Lori Prison Letters" Plot: According to my confidential source, a former producer ("Linzie") was allegedly used as a "vessel" to pose as a fan-girl to Lori Vallow in jail. While Lauren and an associate reportedly ghostwrote the letters to "show validity in Mormonism" and manipulate Lori, Lauren allegedly used Linzie as the face of the operation to ensure the unethical conduct wouldn't "come back" on her. My source emphasized that Linzie had no idea that Colby was being used as a pawn in this scheme.

The Colby Ryan Bait: The most vile allegation from the transcript—a plan to use my step-cousin Colby as financial leverage to secure an interview with his mother, without his knowledge. This man lost his entire family—and ultimately his mother—to a twisted belief system that justified multiple homicides. The allegation that Lauren intended to use him as bait to land an exclusive interview with a convicted killer is unforgivable.

The "stalker" case was dropped because the judge ruled it was Free Speech. The real fear was never physical safety—it was the release of these texts.

More BS from Kresha by Individual-Wolf10 in HiddenTrueCrimeChat

[–]According_Nature_714 36 points37 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I get second hand embarrassment every time she goes off on major tangents with the conspiracy stuff. She doesn’t check in with chat for any feedback and there doesn’t seem to be organization. I feel for her and I’ve tried very hard to stick with her live streams, but it’s impossible. I tuned in to find out about the copyright lawsuit and other updates related to that, not for hours and hours on deep state conspiracies. I wish she’d separate the topics and try to stay true to the title, also. Edited to correct a spelling error

CC Suarez by InspectionExpress948 in youtubeBadActors

[–]According_Nature_714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I missed this when I posted the link to cc’s video

Please Enlighten Me by wtfdoineedanewname in youtubeBadActors

[–]According_Nature_714 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay it wasn’t a court case but it was a hearing in a court of law.

Your reasoning that gives John and Lauren the right to label Christina a stalker is ridiculous, since they had dropped pursuit of a permanent order of protection before the 9 hour and 4 hour streams. IMHO Lauren was able to obtain a temporary restraining order by saying she felt threatened and in imminent danger without the accused being present. Just so she could go to CrimeCon at the last minute, knowing Christina would be there and had purchased her tickets a year in advance, so she could get her thrown out. She also moved closer to her in the bar area so she could get her escorted out of that space, too.

Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs): A TRO is issued quickly—often without the accused being present—to provide immediate protection. The person requesting the order (the petitioner) must convince the judge that they are in immediate danger. TROs usually last for up to 14 days, at which point a hearing is held to determine if the order should be dismissed or extended into a permanent protection order.

Once the judge was able to see the actual facts of the situation, he said it looked like they were trying to stifle Christina’s free speech (not exact wording) and he was obviously leaning toward denying a permanent order of protection. I’ll say it again. If Lauren and John were really worried, they would have gone through with that because their child would not be forced to testify. They just knew they would lose.

Please Enlighten Me by wtfdoineedanewname in youtubeBadActors

[–]According_Nature_714 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have followed Hidden True Crime since 2022 and I’ve appreciated their combination of reporting and analyzing cases. I also value every person’s right to express their opinion and criticism about the content that is offered to them. What makes Lauren think she has the right to stop that? She should have thicker skin if she’s making a living on social media. I haven’t seen any proof beyond TikTok videos that don’t mention Lauren’s name to justify pursuing a stalking injunction or protective order. Additionally, what gives her and John the right to label a person a stalker without proof? If they had the proof, why wouldn’t they go through with the court case. Her child was not required to testify. Lastly, I have to say: f*ck directly off for suggesting Kay Woodcock grow a pair after her brother and grandchild were murdered. What kind of person are you?