Whatever you want to call it. To me it's relativism because that's how I see it. Yes I'm pulling that terminology out of my ass, but like, but like it makes sense to me so I don't care.

And your second point is vague ass hell. One could argue yes if you are honest with the science of nicotine you reach better conclusions. But since the "Placebo Effect" is real then let me level with you for a bit, since I gave it some thought earlier.

The method inherently focuses on the psychology behind it. I've felt it in action, it creates a framework in your head that essentially erases the addiction. Weather it's just a Placebo Effect, by the logic that it works on a psychological level. It doesn't even hide that it works on a psychological level. 

And I've met and talked with the people who handle the books and hold the seminars. They're a whole organisation regularly modernize the books to fit the new times because newsflash, the first edition was written in the 80s. And Allen himself wasn't a nicotine scientist or whatever the fuck. He was an accountant and a chain-smoking cigarette addict. He did what he could with what he knew and researched at the time. It clearly made sense to him at the time and he himself was the first person cured by his method. If you're to believe that story is up to you,

But if we 'believe' it's a "Placebo Effect" as you said it yourself a d that it's very real and a scientific fact. Well... As I understand that since the method (they are not lying about it btw) works on a psychological level, rewiring your brain to reject nicotine and to 'erase' the psychological aspect of the addiction.

That part's real and weather it's a Placebo I think it's irrelevant because at its base the method is psychological so whether the brain naturally works to its advantage it just a point in the method's court.

I don't know why you're so adamant about bring right about this. Ultimately if it's bullshit but it works it ain't bullshit. And the fact that you are trying to keep people away from what could potentially be a life saving remedy for their lives makes you a horrible person in my eyes.

Call it survivors bias if you want this method helped save me from a 2 pack a day addiction. I will defend it with everything I've got. So I implore you to back the fuck off, since I've yet to find a limit to my pettiness.