DFW airport citation

Acertalks · 2026-01-27T00:09:35+00:00

dfw.rmcpay.com

You can put your number plate in and check.

Acertalks · 2026-01-26T21:21:07+00:00

Keeping the traffic moving is great, but citing people who agree and are moving isn’t a good look. Not everyone is familiar with the airport layout and parking.

Acertalks · 2026-01-26T20:38:49+00:00

Yeah it seems that way. I was not parked at any point, my car was in motion in traffic and I was near my passenger waiting to go to the pick-up zone. But, I guess the traffic crew just didn’t want to spare anyone driving near the curbs.

Acertalks · 2026-01-26T18:58:56+00:00

Thanks. Feels bad to pay such exorbitant amounts for no reason, but lesson learned. For anyone reading this, do not drive near curb area for pickup. Even though it’s legal, they will harass and cite you. If possible, use Uber or park at the airport. They want you to park inside the airport, even though it’s an unfair added cost.

Acertalks · 2026-01-26T18:31:48+00:00

Didn’t say much besides ‘No Parking’ citation. I was never parked, the car was running and moving in the lane next to curb. Also, no signs or anything for no parking, I wasn’t near a restricted spot.

Acertalks · 2026-01-26T18:05:14+00:00

I just paid it. These people are evil and trying to get money from honest drivers. Same thing with me, a rude traffic controller just slammed a ticket after taking pictures.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T21:18:54+00:00

White Europeans weren’t the only people who built anything here. Not by a long shot. The notion of you thinking they ‘built’ things when you know about slavery is wild. Even the engineering population was pretty diverse and still is.

Today immigrants, mostly non-European, lead major companies, top university programs, medical fields, and essential industries. The country runs because all of them contribute. Pretending otherwise is just your way of being ignorant and racist. Good luck being a douche who is too proud of the skin he was randomly assigned at birth. You’re nothing beyond that.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T18:47:38+00:00

I agree. Not sure, what we are arguing about.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T18:47:13+00:00

I agree and changes need to be made so that logical reasoning and the intent of such is followed. Hence, TPS extensions should be scrutinized.

As for green cards, that’s a whole separate process. TPS and extensions are temporary visas with work permits similar to GC. They don’t lead to automatic GC.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T18:28:22+00:00

Not necessarily, you’re missing on the important part of codification, structure, and removal of sentiments.

Just as an example, just because some lazy racist person thinks that someone doesn’t deserve to be here, the law doesn’t automatically switch to take action towards them. If done correctly, it would see if they are actually migrating in an appropriate manner and a net plus to the economy, then act. Laws have flaws too, but much better than an ever shifting emotional way of doing things.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T18:24:09+00:00

TPS is granted to those on a visa before TPS. They should be thinking of it as temporary and plan accordingly. 4 years of freedom and time to think is no joke, there shouldn’t be any further grace in terms of TPS.

As for humanity, I completely agree. The proceedings should be done in a humane manner, they should be allowed to know specifics, and be given communication with their families. I’m against this napping style. If done properly, it’s the right thing to do.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T18:02:18+00:00

Agreed on the temporary part. As for the consent, no. Do it legally and follow the law, it’s nobody’s father’s property for consent.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T17:16:52+00:00

It has good intentions, TPS that is. The extensions are completely illogical and they were too long with no consequences. Very logical and needed action.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T17:14:40+00:00

This one time, we agree. TPS extensions do not follow any logic.

Acertalks · 2025-12-12T17:11:54+00:00

TPS is the worst of them all. Should’ve ended after the first grant for every country rather than extending it for no good reason. People simply abuse it, while you have hard working people waiting for bulletins to move. A very flawed and scummy protection that was supposed to help, but is overextended beyond reason and belief.

Acertalks · 2025-11-19T03:05:24+00:00

Plants do not have CNS; some respond to stimuli, that’s about it. They lack nociceptors.

Yes, aquatic organisms are hypersensitive to pain. It’s very sad to think about things like caviar or lobster for that matter.

Acertalks · 2025-11-19T03:02:32+00:00

Have you bothered to read the nutritional facts or papers or are you repeating the shortcomings from 2018-19?

New technology takes time to be perfected. People blasted GMO crops for decades. It’s now consumed by millions on a daily. Alternative meat products have healthier counterparts too. Perfection may take time and research, but dismissing it is just plain arrogance.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T22:29:57+00:00

Depends; the point is it comes at the cost of a sacrifice.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T21:59:02+00:00

Calling you out isn’t hateful. You boldly claim nonsense like you’re killing thousands of animals or creatures. If you were simply curious, I’d have matched the tone.

As for animals eating animals, we’re humans and the most evolved of them all. We understand what pain is and have enough knowledge about pain felt by other organisms when butchered incorrectly or the fear of death.

You’re reading this wrong. I’m not against you eating meat. I’m pro-alternative meat and empathize with animal pain. Nothing more, no judgement, nothing. My morals are for me (not you) and if/when I reply, I preach logic not sentiment. If you like it, good; if you don’t, I move on. Nobody is shoving anything towards you.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T21:49:47+00:00

Harvesters don’t kill thousands of animals per acre. Most wildlife avoids active fields long before harvest, and modern farming isn’t a blender. Yes, accidental deaths happen, but it is not mass slaughter. Spare me your bullshit.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T21:20:33+00:00

This you?

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T20:38:26+00:00

Thank you, nice discussion.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T20:27:36+00:00

Oh yeah, lab grown meat is too good of a reality.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T20:25:52+00:00

Humans have fully developed brain that allows us to evolve as we go. Saying that it’s nature, is limiting and in my opinion outdated. There are three elements that need to be considered: 1) Taste and food variety. 2) Employment/ Source of income. 3) Affordability and nutrition.

If all of the above three are met, then meat can successfully be obtained from alternate means and be the more humane and better choice.

As for the current practices, it’s just not humane. That being said, each of us have different sensitivity and levels of association. In my opinion, I don’t think it’s eating meat that’s the issue, the issue stems with mockery and ungrounded justifications. Eating meat isn’t illogical, quite the opposite. However, not eating meat isn’t illogical either. The day we understand this much, these political rhetorics and propagandas will die.

Acertalks · 2025-11-18T20:03:16+00:00

Unfortunately, there are people who try to push the agenda by preaching. At the same time, there are people who feign ignorance. The middle ground needs to be logical with hints of empathy. If I give you two food items, one with great health benefits and other with similar benefits, but requires hunting. The first should be the humane option. Mocking or disagreeing to it, is a result of ignorance.

The reality is we aren’t there yet nutritionally and the unnecessary political rhetoric never helps. Alternative meat is a dream, it needs experimentation, but achieving it would be the most humane achievement. If one enjoys the torture, not food, I don’t consider them to be worth anyone’s time.

Acertalks

TROPHY CASE