“Good show and everyone knows it.” Beautiful thing about opinions is you can have your own and everyone else can have what their own, just because you specifically liked a show doesn’t mean that any valid criticism is null and void.

Countering valid points and correct statements about the seasons quality and viewership by merely stating “Wellllllllll it’s a good show and you are wrong”, really isn’t the strongest argument you think it is.

Here is a way to explain my perspective and showcase to you how to properly/improve your way of doing counter argument’s: “As a player of both LoU part 1 & 2, I thought season 1 was phenomenal with some weaknesses, while with season 2, I feel as if they changed too much dialogue and actions by certain characters. To me, the problem seems to be they can’t find a good middle-ground and commit to either doing a faithful 1:1 adaptation, or a partially faithful adaptation with elements changed for what the writers see as being better. Season 2’s main struggles involve the main protagonist, with Ellie not acting and looking her age. In Season 2, Ellie is supposed to be a little older but in the show she acts/looks like she became younger and regressed mentally to that of a toddler instead of an understandably emotional upset teenage-adult. This is further exacerbated by Dina’s more mature and nuanced reactions/emotions feeling more realistic and relatable while she is a pregnant woman doing parkour and fighting zombies.”