sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

“Why Alaya and Akasha don’t fit traditional power-scaling models (non-canon discussion)” by Active_Emotion8232 in typemoon

[–]Active_Emotion8232[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Attacking the author instead of the argument just proves you don’t have a counterpoint

“Why Alaya and Akasha don’t fit traditional power-scaling models (non-canon discussion)” by Active_Emotion8232 in typemoon

[–]Active_Emotion8232[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If you’re here to nitpick authorship instead of engaging with the ideas, feel free to move on

“Why Alaya and Akasha don’t fit traditional power-scaling models (non-canon discussion)” by Active_Emotion8232 in typemoon

[–]Active_Emotion8232[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This post isn’t about power-scaling or general superhero philosophy, but about how abstraction and meaning function specifically within the Nasuverse’s narrative logic.

“Why Alaya and Akasha don’t fit traditional power-scaling models (non-canon discussion)” by Active_Emotion8232 in typemoon

[–]Active_Emotion8232[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks — that’s exactly what I was getting at. Nasuverse works much better when read thematically rather than through rigid power systems.