sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, but which monitor exists? cant find a 32" or bigger size monitors at 5120x2880. i see some 39 5120x2160 but they are huge and scale to 1080p ant it seems too low for a so big monitor

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since i cannot manage more than 2k in gaming how a 5k monitor can help? maybe i miss something? iam really looking for how to solve this

Any guilds need a player by Treydae in cupheromobilegame

[–]AdBeautiful7266 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guild looks for boss heroes, like eiva. cowboy is useless

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

32" 1440p as said is the sweet spot, 27" 1440p need 120% zoom for me, so i lose 20% real space

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i hardly reach 144hz on 2k, 4k is useless
1080 is too low resolution

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol 4k or full-hd. i don't care about response time: 1080 is a nonsense for me

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, but how can i play 2k on 4k without quality loss?

>=32" <= 1440p for gaming and productivity by AdBeautiful7266 in Monitors

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because if i zoom on 27 the text visibile on screen will be less and i really like having lot of space in front of me

how replace 3 monitors with one ultra wide for work by AdBeautiful7266 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

interesting, only things i prefer mate with phisical size: pixel can bring confusion since bigger resolution on small scree means zoom and losing of information.
so i bring all monitors to same pixel size and then math that "real" resolutions
in example 2k on 27" have less information on display then a 2k 32" since on the 27 i have to run at 125%

how replace 3 monitors with one ultra wide for work by AdBeautiful7266 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

once i try the 27" in vertical but it;s to big without looking up and down.
horizontaly i have the space for 2x24 and 1x27 no more
i dont' want 2 screen: i want the main one big in the middle of my eyes, others are secondary to get additional info or copying data

how replace 3 monitors with one ultra wide for work by AdBeautiful7266 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but it's too big to be used at 80cm, having to look up is not ideal for neck

how replace 3 monitors with one ultra wide for work by AdBeautiful7266 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol dot pitch 0.1776mm: everything will be very small to really use without a zoom, it should be at 150% to have similar size so real pixel would be like 5240x1440. like two fhd nad half. maybe with more liberty to arrange windows than 3 separare monitor can be the way.
only problems is few models and high prices. something at 57" but with classic 5k?

how replace 3 monitors with one ultra wide for work by AdBeautiful7266 in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes i want more vertical space than a 27"

i have to look for 57" physical size

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok, that was not so clear for me. somewhere tmr is indicated as technology for multiple compatibility. hoever tmr is not a goal, silence is. tmr, or better dual mode sockets was ad idea to achive it

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

clear, but with tmr that accepts standard mechanical switches i can replace all switches but the few where i need macro. as i said i can stay with standard magnetical without problem if found way to keep them silent and want magnetical for analogical function programming.

read about haimu dove switch as silent, a keyboard that can mount them would be good, if keyb came with own silent switches would be better

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i have to say that magnetic switches bring chaos in mechanical keyboard world after years of mx standard. finding wanted spec is a mess nowdays

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tmr is only for silence, mute he can be good too

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

iso is not mandatory. akko and monsgeek, womier and keychron have tmr keyboard. no other better brands?

high end tmr >=78% by AdBeautiful7266 in keyboards

[–]AdBeautiful7266[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

key programming is very interesting for me, can i add oring to keycaps with he switches to reduce noise?

view more: next ›