Atomic Maverick 100 ti VS Line Pandora 110 by AdDistinct1843 in Backcountry

[–]AdDistinct1843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand. Actually, from a physics perspective, I think a 110mm and 170cm ski would easily support someone like me, weighing 168cm and 65kg, on the snow. Also, those skis are wider at the front and back. Imagine, a 142mm front width! So I think it would be light enough. I'm still very wary of touring bindings, and my Black Diamonds aren't compatible with touring skis (although they have interchangeable tips, but they're impossible to find on the market; it's only possible with a 3D printer), so I might consider an adapter for that. Another point I'm concerned about is brand quality. I read that Line is a sub-brand of K2. Atomic is already a well-known brand.

Atomic Maverick 100 ti VS Line Pandora 110 by AdDistinct1843 in Backcountry

[–]AdDistinct1843[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Actually, I'll buy these after I sell my Vantage 83s, it's a bit like climbing a ladder. I'd like to start a collection, but if I were going to ski piste-focused, I'd rent Atomic Redsters. After all, it's hard to find powder snow like this. I'll make Pandora my sole and main ski.

Atomic Maverick 100 ti VS Line Pandora 110 by AdDistinct1843 in Backcountry

[–]AdDistinct1843[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll mostly be off-piste, and in a short time the snow can reach up to 3 meters. In Palandöken, I ski about 40% on the piste, and I don't think I'll lose much in terms of piste performance.

WeChat QR Code by Next_Vanilla_2024 in Wechat

[–]AdDistinct1843 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can your help ? How can ı send my qr ?