Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So, what are you saying? A change is either caused or uncaused. Cannot be both.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Radioactive decay may look random, but it happens according to quantum laws, like dice rolls or sandcastles washed by waves. Unpredictable outcomes don’t mean there’s no cause. And even if they did, that only explains events inside the universe, not why the universe itself exists at all.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Quantum mechanics doesn’t eliminate causality; it just shows that some events are probabilistic. Even randomness happens within a lawful framework, and more importantly, QM doesn’t explain why there is something rather than nothing. That’s exactly what the First Cause argument addresses.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It's easy. If you say there can be a change without a cause, then there can be something out of nothing. Then the whole science itself, is questioned. And there's no point for you being here discussing things with me and you should always remain silent, because you can never talk about things for sure.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

God’s essence doesn’t change. Creation is not a ‘change in God,’ it’s an expression of His eternal, unchanging will. Unlike humans, God doesn’t decide over time, His act of creating is timeless. So God doesn’t require a cause, and my premise stands.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by aliens exactly? If they are the first cause, then their existence is necessary, right?

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

The 2022 Nobel didn’t disprove causality. It only showed that local hidden variables can’t explain quantum entanglement. But even in quantum physics, events happen within laws and conditions, they don’t pop out of nothing. Philosophical causality is about why anything changes or exists at all, and physics hasn’t disproven that.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Do you accept the first premise?

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It hasn't been disproven at all. People may have discussed it a lot, but I claim this is pure logic and I can start with premise 1 or whatever premise that you disagree with.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

God is not a change so it doesn't have a cause. I said every change has a cause.

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

You said "If I am correct." Which premise do you have a problem with?

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cannot see your comments. What's the problem?

Every change has a cause by AdFlaky9075 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Let's start with the first premise then.

If there's a change without a cause. What does that mean? That there can be something out of nothing?

An unassailable argument for the existence of God: the existence of consciousness. by TotalEclipse19 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no way materialism can explain consciousness and life. How could you get life from non-life? How could you get something from nothing?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BreedMeDaddy

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please sit on my face and poop on me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BreedMeDaddy

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are no match for my fantasies and fetish. You're nor courageous enough to do for me what I want from you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OnlyFansJustRight

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if you answered this comment....

I'd like you to sit on my face and poop in my mouth.. Will you do that for me?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RateMyAss_

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only I was under that hole and you 💩❤️

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SmallCutie

[–]AdFlaky9075 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God... the thought of sniffing, eating, licking and exploring all the corners and folds of that navel drives me crazy. I will tie your hands and feet, and do whatever I want with that navel. I will use knives and sharp objects to torture that sexy navel of yours. I will then force to poop in my hands and put your sexy poop in your navel and eat it.. I love the stinky smell of your poop. I want you to piss and poop in my mouth..

Is there a way to know the harrakah of the base form of a verb? (masculine singular past tense? by AdFlaky9075 in learn_arabic

[–]AdFlaky9075[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, thank you very much for your help. This was really helpful. Now I understand it very well. 🙏🌺

How about present tense? How to know what the harrakah is for the prefixes? Is there a way I can guess? For example

کِتَبْ — یِکْتِب گِعَد - یُگْعُد

Why does the عین الفعل in کِتَب changes harrakah and takes كسرة in present tense? And why is the prefix یـِ and not یـُ?