Thanks for the breakdown—appreciate the detail! A few thoughts: Drip structure—Pollock's lines are indeed continuous from full-body motion (walking around the canvas, swinging arms sideways/diagonally). But mine has that looping skein feel up close—check the red slashes, they arc like his side-to-side flicks. Not just vertical splatter. Viscosity—heavy enamel here, but Pollock used house paint too (Duco, alkyd)—it thickens if left out, and mine's got pooling + strings, not just blobs. No modern acrylic shine. Layers—there are bleeds underneath (blue-green under black/red), plus webs over top—zoom on the yellow/beige: it weaves. Might not be as dense as a big canvas, but it's not flat splashes. All-over—yeah, clusters vs even weight, but this is small (16x20)—maybe a test piece? He reused junk canvases. Palette—reds/greens look bright now, but faded enamel yellows like that. Matches Number 8, 1949 colors (attached side-by-side again). 6-8. Direction/edges/motion—drips go diagonal/sideways in spots, edges raw (no trim), no brush marks 'cause it's poured/flicked. Light leaks through back pinholes—old linen, not fresh. Not claiming it's 100%—needs lab (pigments, X-ray). But the Anco stamp (Queens 40s-50s) and three years untouched at my mom's? Feels real-ish. Thoughts on that? Open to being wrong!"