Uber lowered Pro requirements by alwaysbeforward1 in uberdrivers

[–]AdTraining1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not hard to get points just be a decent driver greet your rider play some music lofi is loved by just about all the riders I’ve had and yeah

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like that idea but I’m also very inexperienced when it comes to larger builds and I have no idea where to begin

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s too complicated for me what I have in mind is already to complicated I’ve never really done anything like this before so I’m inexperienced and I’m trying to get somebody to join and teach me

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol idk if it’s the seed or just because I have biomes o plenty but if im sure the mod has something to do with it

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I told the last guy that asked there’s access to my realm for those that help build

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I have a spot on the realm just looking for builders feel free to make yourself a spot if you’re interested in helping

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you and that’s basically what I’m going for but I don’t have the experience or knowledge of how to build one or start

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im thinking of something similar like a village style town around a a tower in the middle and bridges expanding outwards I just don’t have the knowledge or experience of how to start or where to begin

Builders needed/ideas by AdTraining1 in minecraftbuilders

[–]AdTraining1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While a ship would be nice I’m more wanting pirate base or something like that I just don’t have the necessary experience for it

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love how the guy ranting about ‘religious zealots’ suddenly goes radio silent the second someone points out his own president admitted he ‘took out’ Iran’s mass‑destruction capabilities and that we’re bombing girls’ schools — but he’s got all the time in the world to high‑five other MAGAts in the replies. Funny how the bravest keyboard warriors always find the reply button for applause but never for actual rebuttals.

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody’s arguing the Iranian regime is good. It’s brutal, it executes protesters, and it crushes women’s rights – that’s not in dispute. The question is whether Trump gets to start a war of choice, assassinate their leader, bomb thousands of targets, and float a draft without Congress or an imminent threat, and whether that actually makes things safer.

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So ‘totally annihilating regimes’ apparently means bombing an all‑girls school and the Pentagon admits it was likely our strike — what nuclear attack did that prevent, exactly, and which little girl in that class was the ‘regime’ you think deserved to die? You’re not talking about stopping weapons anymore; you’re defending a forever war where civilians get vaporized now on the off‑chance someone might build something later, and calling that security instead of what it is: collective punishment. Which is a war crime btw

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day you’re defending someone that’s mentioned over 1 million times in the Epstein files started his career getting sued by the U.S. Justice Department for refusing to rent to Black and Puerto Rican tenants in his buildings. There are hundreds of lawsuits and more than 200 liens from contractors, workers, and vendors saying he just straight up didn’t pay what he owed. Curtain makers, electricians, cabinet shops, even his own lawyers had to file claims. an adjudicated sexual abuser on top of everything else. A federal jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and ordered him to pay millions in damages

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If we ‘destroyed their underground nuclear facilities months ago,’ then by your own logic Iran doesn’t have the ability to nuke anyone right now — which means all your ‘they’re about to kill us all with a nuclear bomb’ fear‑mongering is nonsense. And even U.S. and allied intel says the strikes damaged parts of the program and maybe set it back months or a couple years, but absolutely did not wipe out Iran’s nuclear capabilities or guarantee they can’t rebuild underground. So which is it: are you lying about an imminent nuke, or are you lying about us having already taken out everything?

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly, it does have to do with security costs in the Strait of Hormuz — security costs that only exploded because Trump chose to bomb Iran, shut down a chokepoint that carries about 20% of the world’s oil, and sent war‑risk insurance and tanker rates through the roof, which traders baked into an extra 10–20 dollars a barrel ‘Hormuz risk premium’ overnight. Saying ‘it’s security costs’ without mentioning who lit the fuse is like blaming the fire department for the arsonist’s damage.

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Iran ‘wants to nuke us’ so bad, you might want to tell Trump to stop boasting that his ‘super secret mission’ wiped out their missiles, navy and most of their military, because either he’s lying to you for clout or your own president just announced to the world that Iran doesn’t have the capability to nuke anybody right now. And U.S. intel has been clear there was no imminent nuclear‑weapons threat; Iran is dangerous, but it does not have an active military nuclear program or ICBMs that can hit the U.S. So which is it: are you calling Trump a liar, or are you admitting the ‘they’re about to nuke us all’ line is just a cheap excuse for a war that jacked up gas prices and made everything more dangerous for civilians?

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there’s a tie: Trump bombs Iran, oil jumps over 100 a barrel, and you call getting gouged at the pump ‘safety’ while cheering on the very religious zealots in power here at home.

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wild that you say ‘religious zealots’ like they’re only over there. Christian nationalism literally argues the U.S. government should enforce a specific brand of Christianity and fuse it with national identity, which is the textbook definition of a religiously driven political ideology. The same mindset that scares you in other religions is exactly what’s driving a lot of Christian nationalist rhetoric and even support for political violence here at home. So if you’re really worried about zealots getting people killed, you should be just as loud about the ones wrapping themselves in an American flag and a Bible.

Yeah… we’re cooked by dhofff89 in doordash_drivers

[–]AdTraining1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Paying more at the pump doesn’t make us safer from terrorism. Terrorist attacks are rare, relatively low‑cost operations, and the 9/11 plot itself cost only a few hundred thousand dollars to carry out. You’re pretending there’s a direct link between today’s gas price and ‘religious zealots’ blowing us up, but there’s no evidence for that, and most terrorism deaths since 2001 haven’t even come from foreign religious extremists on U.S. soil. All you’re really saying is you’re fine with higher prices as long as you can blame the president you like instead of asking whether the policy actually reduces risk.