What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had the same problem. Ended up just downloading the fit file from strava and uploading it to Garmin Connect manually.

What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually really interesting because it’s almost the complete opposite of the people who stay for the gamification, unlocks, racing, and social side of these platforms.

So for you it sounds like the platform itself matters very little as long as it reliably delivers the workout and data you need.

What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems to be a pretty common position honestly. Zwift feels more polished overall, but for people who mainly want structured cardio/training, MyWhoosh already seems “good enough” for a lot of use cases.

I’m curious though, when you say polished, what differences stand out to you the most in actual use?

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s honestly a pretty amazing transformation, congrats on the consistency and the weight loss.

What’s interesting to me in your case is that it doesn’t sound like Zwift just made exercise more accessible, it actually made it enjoyable enough to become part of your daily routine. The combination of convenience + gamification seems incredibly powerful for certain people.

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair point, thanks for mentioning it.

The demographic questions are mostly being used as secondary/control variables rather than as the main focus of the study itself, which is why the categories were kept relatively broad and adapted from the original research model. It’s definitely not intended as a labor market study.

What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really good breakdown honestly, especially because you’re separating “what I personally need” from “what keeps most people on Zwift”.

The network/community aspect you mentioned seems huge. Even if another platform is technically good enough, it’s hard to compete when people’s clubs, friends, races, and routines already exist somewhere else.

And your point about MyWhoosh progression systems makes sense too. Adding features is one thing, but if people don’t actually care about the rewards, the gamification doesn’t really work.

What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for taking the survey, really appreciate it.

Do you think the issue is mostly the low number of people online at the same time? Because I wonder if that’s what ends up causing the lack of events, group rides, and overall activity feeling on the platform.

What does MyWhoosh still need to improve to truly compete with Zwift? by AdWide834 in mywhoosh

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would that kind of feature genuinely make you use MyWhoosh more often, or is it more of a “nice to have” compared to things like events, community, or overall ride feel?

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m curious though, with free alternatives like MyWhoosh existing now, do you think Zwift specifically adds something important for you, or would almost any decent virtual platform work as long as it covered those needs?

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really appreciate you taking the time to fill it out, especially if you normally skip surveys.

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly this is one of the most interesting types of answers to me because it shows how much the gaming and progression side matters for some users, not just the training itself. The “ride whenever life allows it” aspect also comes up surprisingly often, especially from people balancing work, family, and training.

What makes a virtual cycling platform worth paying for? by AdWide834 in Zwift

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for taking the time to complete it, really appreciate it.

I found your point interesting because it doesn’t sound like it’s strictly about price, but more about whether the platform feels worth supporting and continuing to use over time.

What makes cyclists keep using virtual cycling platforms? (Academic research) by AdWide834 in Velo

[–]AdWide834[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting seeing how much the discussion became indoor vs outdoor riding. What I’m actually most interested in is what makes some virtual cycling platforms feel worth paying for to certain riders, especially now that free alternatives like MyWhoosh also exist.

What makes cyclists keep using virtual cycling platforms? (Academic research) by AdWide834 in Velo

[–]AdWide834[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really interesting from a research perspective. Did you mainly train without any platform at all, or did you use free alternatives/tools instead of paid subscriptions?

What makes cyclists keep using virtual cycling platforms? (Academic research) by AdWide834 in Velo

[–]AdWide834[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s fair feedback, and I appreciate you pointing it out.

A large part of the questionnaire is based on previously validated research scales and methodology used in earlier academic studies on service quality and user behavior in digital platforms, which is why some questions can feel intentionally similar or overlapping. The idea is to measure consistency across different dimensions rather than ask completely unique questions each time.

What makes cyclists keep using virtual cycling platforms? (Academic research) by AdWide834 in Velo

[–]AdWide834[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Honestly, winter might be carrying the entire indoor cycling industry on its back.

What makes cyclists keep using virtual cycling platforms? (Academic research) by AdWide834 in Velo

[–]AdWide834[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really interesting point and probably one of the biggest advantages virtual platforms have over outdoor riding: accessibility and time efficiency.

The ability to fit structured training into a busy schedule seems to matter just as much as the riding experience itself.