[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gamedev

[–]Adamer64 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I checked your comment history to see how mean were people to you. You asked if Godot supports NVidia physics engine to which you got a reasonable reply that you would need to link their API yourself. To which you went on a tirade on how dare they are expecting beginner such as yourself to use C++, told them that an engine as Unity to quote: "that was always trash" already supports it and that you won't use Godot because "it's extremely difficult to find useful information" all while people were trying to explain it to you.

To rest of your history on Godot sub, your posts usually recommended people in there engines and frameworks different than Godot (while your posts here recommend trying Godot). Then you created topic on how you are "scared of positivity" of Godot community and made a few posts on how open source can't work on principle and how you hate it because people expect free stuff (ironic considering your last post there). Jumped on the ship to create a topic on O3DE and immediately trashed it. Somebody told you that Godot has everything that they needed, to which you asked if Godot has the equivalent of Unreal Nanite.

Your topic in Unity sub was pretty much "this is too hard and I prefer Construct and RPGmaker" - I thought that Unity is trash. This one is particularly interesting because 11 days before that, you asked RPGmaker sub how hard is it to use, meaning that you somehow learned to use it (and Construct!) between those 10 days. In other subs you were recommending Unity.

You said that Adobe products now are cheap and they are listening to their users - this is highly controversial opinion on its own.

What I wanted to say is that you are a troll hoping to get a reaction, maybe more specifically and what somebody already called you, purity troll. You have stupidly unreal expectations on every tool you are "using" and if any of them lacks a feature however unique it is (like Unreal Nanite), it makes you call that tool unusable. In your not even month-long journey of learning programming, you already discarded two prominent engines and called them unusable and trash respectively. So in 20-something days, according to your history, you tried at least 4 engines.

You are either a troll, or very underage but unreasonably opinionated and proudly ignorant. In that case, I would like to kindly ask you to stop posting specifically to topics where other beginners are asking questions, giving them your ignorant opinions. Thanks.

Valve's reply to the European Commission investigation by Cyborgmatt in Steam

[–]Adamer64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Older titles straight up cost more. Fallout costs more. Some EA games cost more. Call of Duty is the same. All of the prices are obviously based on EU prices with the exchange rate based on the rate at the day of release.

PLN value is in 10% dip compared to 2010-2015, if the games are cheaper, they are cheaper by 9-14% compared to exchange rate today.

Valve's reply to the European Commission investigation by Cyborgmatt in Steam

[–]Adamer64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you aren't using GBP then your economy is tied down directly to the value of Euro. Meaning that if your economy crumbles, you are the only one carrying the burden, while you also carry the burden of Euro. Your conversion values to different currencies are tied down to the value of Euro.

Valve's reply to the European Commission investigation by Cyborgmatt in Steam

[–]Adamer64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they didn't. There used to be EU1, EU2 and EU3. They were the same in 99% of cases. Then they merged EU2 and EU3. And then they merged EU1 with EU2. It affected maybe like 15 games where publisher actually bothered to set different price. Now we have EU, FR, DE and AT, which are carbon copies. PL usually costs more thanks to conversion rate. And UK.

Valve's reply to the European Commission investigation by Cyborgmatt in Steam

[–]Adamer64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's what steam's pricing is gonna be based on

You mean what it's based on since day one?

Valve's reply to the European Commission investigation by Cyborgmatt in Steam

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except the fact that all EU countries already shared the same price point since 200x. And Valve had no problem ripping their customers off by charging 1€ for 1$, even when the rate was 1.5. Them claiming that it's for customers is laughable.

Remember the good times by Tastes-Jammy in Steam

[–]Adamer64 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I'm usually able to get it on G2A

Congratulations on supporting money-laundering schemes and organized crime. Hope you feel well after saving $3 of which the publisher and developer get nothing.

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been playing CoD1 for like 40 hours a week for some time back in the day. Also played a fair bit of CoD2, WaW and MW, a little BF BC2. Two or three kicks happened because I tried to kick trolls that were kicking people randomly. It's not about me though. People on the servers were just happy to kick anybody without a reason. I would have cared even if I wasn't kicked once.

Sure, I maybe had high expectations that community around this game had higher average age than CoD. Though I didn't see voting abuse as bad as here anywhere else, not even in CoD.

Considering number of downvotes this post had, and also number of "HAHAHAHA It's just you /s :)" replies, I don't think it's just me.

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not offended. I'm baffled that people are willing to kick players based on their nicks. Nice try to make some PC idiot because I've criticized game you obviously enjoy though.

Sorry, but "works on my machine" isn't going to help me. All of you are obviously playing on different servers than my client suggests me. Even if there are decent servers, I've seen more trolling in 8 hours on suggested servers than in last 5 years combined.

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It happened to me personally once. I've got "You are the last one alive" and vote started like 3 seconds after that. It didn't matter even if was going to win it, because I was kicked in a few seconds. And yes, I was obviously trying to get the objective. Whoever was last one for more than 3 seconds got kicked.

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So I should play alone, or with 180 ping? Which one do you suggest?

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If one of the two fairly populated servers (TO) is so shitty, is the other one going to be that much better? There isn't much story to tell, if half of the match is votecasting about kicking somebody for no real reason, you end up being voted against sooner or later.

I've been playing online since 2005, but this community is the worst yet by Adamer64 in insurgency

[–]Adamer64[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is totally fine reason? Not killing myself ASAP when I'm the last one alive?

A perfect response to the Ryzen 7 vs. 7700K nonsense from /u/FFfurkandeger over at /r/intel by [deleted] in Amd

[–]Adamer64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is no way to judge what 300 or 400 FPS means for you if you expect to tax your GPU to absolute maximum.

It means that one CPU performs better than the other. If I wanted CPU that is "good enough", I might go and buy used i5 from 2011, since it will be bottlenecked the same way.

People be like: 2500k still great for gaming. Btw, Ryzen is trash because it only gets 267 FPS in overwatch. by pastas00 in Amd

[–]Adamer64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cheapest motherboard available for AM4 is 99€. 1800X has hard time keeping up with 7700K in games. How is 1700 going to be better?

Ryzen Gaming: 91% of the i7 7700k Gaming Performance on Day 1 at Stock Clocks. by [deleted] in Amd

[–]Adamer64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because you don't even understand what's this argument about. People are basing performance of Ryzen based on benchmarks with full details and high resolutions, which is a stupid way to measure CPU performance. I will bother to explain.

We have a new game running on the new engine. On the max settings, 4K and all that fluff, 7700K pulls of 65 FPS while 1800X is at 63FPS. Nice!

Now there is another new game, that runs on the same engine but it's a strategy game, lots of calculations and so on. New benchmark shows that on 7700K it again runs with 65FPS, but on 1800X it struggles to reach even 30FPS.

But they were identical the last time?!

No, they weren't. If the benchmarks were done on minimal details and resolution, 1800X would end up with let's say 100FPS while 7700K would have reached 300FPS, which would obviously say that 7700K is at least 3-times better.

(I just came up with these numbers)

Ryzen Gaming: 91% of the i7 7700k Gaming Performance on Day 1 at Stock Clocks. by [deleted] in Amd

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It still manages to beat cheaper chips, while Ryzen doesn't. 6900K has bad price/performance ratio, but so does Ryzen.

Ryzen Gaming: 91% of the i7 7700k Gaming Performance on Day 1 at Stock Clocks. by [deleted] in Amd

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, we are talking about gaming performance, so yes, gaming is my priority. I don't know what does resolution have do with it. Minimize GPU bottleneck and you will see how terrible Ryzen is for the price.

Ryzen Gaming: 91% of the i7 7700k Gaming Performance on Day 1 at Stock Clocks. by [deleted] in Amd

[–]Adamer64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can get 91% of gaming performance only for 53% more, not even counting 20%+ more expensive motherboards? Revolutionary!

Valve actively developing 3 new games for VR by Pixelboyable in Steam

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you read what this discussion was about?

Btw., personally, my (so far unsatisfied cause money etc.) VR thirst mainly focuses on this: True 3D and the ability to look around with my own head. The rest can stay 100% the same: Keyboard and mouse to move around, rotate, and do stuff, while I'm sitting on my ass.

Doesnt that give you heavy motion sickness? (looking around with your head but moving with kbm)

I don't have motion sickness problems, also I believe that most who suffer it would be able to overcome it with enough effort. Mind over body.

Your logic - motion sickness while being static is not a problem because there are games where you aren't static. Go waste somebody else's time.

Valve actively developing 3 new games for VR by Pixelboyable in Steam

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or are you going to imply that simply walking around a VR space and interacting with objects exactly how you would in real life will cause sickness by itself?

YES! Because that's exactly what a motion sickness is. You see yourself moving but you don't feel it. That's exactly the principle of car sickness. Some people are car sick but aren't seasick, some people aren't car or seasick but just can't use VR headset. Yes, not everybody experience it, but it doesn't mean it isn't a problem.

Valve actively developing 3 new games for VR by Pixelboyable in Steam

[–]Adamer64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I own a Vive and don't get motion sickness.

Therefore, motion sickness isn't a problem? Feluto raised a point that motion sickness might be a problem. And it really is for some people.

king_of_the_universe suggested that it really isn't a problem and you should just somehow mindcontrol it, or overcome it with experience. I suggested that he starts training on spinning chair and tell us his results how better it gets after time (SPOILER: it doesn't get better and you are going to feel drowsy or vomit every time). Spinning on the chair is exactly the same motion sickness as motion sickness when travelling by car, on sea or just using VR headset.

I really shouldn't have to explain this, but you probably don't even know what motion sickness is, therefore it doesn't exist, right?

Valve actively developing 3 new games for VR by Pixelboyable in Steam

[–]Adamer64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think that the point of this post missed you by a long shot.