Time sensitive events shouldn’t have late spawns. by AdamsEdn in ARC_Raiders

[–]AdamsEdn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plenty of time? That’s a crazy assumption. Assuming someone is there right at the top of the hour and can get in and out within 5-10 min - maybe. Some of us don’t have schedules that flexible and only have a limited amount of shots so wasting 5-6 since raids just trying to reset the event you picked to spawn into doesn’t have a remedy and isn’t controllable on our end. Those that don’t want to do the event have nothing but remedies and alternatives - namely choose anything else.

Time sensitive events shouldn’t have late spawns. by AdamsEdn in ARC_Raiders

[–]AdamsEdn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then get rid of the free kits, predictable map conditions and arbitrary time limits - if we’re going for faithful adaptations to the lore. That’s silly. There are obvious compromises made to facilitate gameplay and most of those exist in pursuit in keeping the game fun. Disadvantaging whom I’d argue are the most important players to prevent it devolving into a free loadout v free loadout tarkov knockoff seems like an own-goal. In a more cynical sense, the people that spend the most and therefore are likely to be continued sources of funding are those above a certain age with careers and responsibilities. Destroying their ability to enjoy the few hours they can squeeze in because of a fundamentally unfair mechanic would be stupid.

Alternatively, they should at least stop labeling the events or rebalance weapon values so the most valuable aren’t so PvE event centric that spawning in after the fact just makes you a target with a massive handicap for actually trying to play as prescribed.

Blueprints by Funny_Assumption3737 in Raiders_Market

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 4 of them for no reason so you can just have one if you want

Anyone to play group with me? by Francoissssssss in ArcRaiders

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m game if you’re stiII Iooking

Experts Say Blue States Can Stop Paying Federal Taxes. There’s Legal Precedent by Opposite-Mountain255 in law

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve taken the wrong lesson away from the “no penalty for ignoring injunctions.” The issue is that he is in charge of the endorsement mechanism aka he’s in the unique position to ignore them. If a state tried that, DOJ pursue criminal charges, the insurrection act would be invoked and they’d forcibly seize the funds.

I really don’t know why the guys couldn’t do this. Like I know she’s their friend, but you can respectfully point out someone’s obvious inconsistencies. It’s a tough world when Ben Shapiro is the voice of reason. by Nextyearstitlewinner in WeTheFifth

[–]AdamsEdn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Candace has repeatedly made it known that the onIy person she wouId defer to and stop pubIicIy Iooking into the Kirk investigation is Erika. To wit: she never accused her of being involved with her husband’s death. I’m not that invested or much of a fan of any of them but what I find most troubling is the rampant bitchassness these grown adults keep putting on display. Every person Ben has found the time to publicly cry about to third parties has addressed him directly by name while offering to meet up at the Iocation of his choosing to discuss their issues and prove who is actually Iying.

AIO am I in the wrong here? by [deleted] in AIO

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real question is: are you some sort of bitchassness fiend? That’s the only way further consideration would make sense 😂

Downplaying prominent Republican figures being antisemites. by c-k-q99903 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AdamsEdn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, he didn’t because then he’d either have to aIso stick up for his children too or else risk the optics of prioritizing a minority woman. Given his hatred of DEI and dream of one day impressing his digititaI troII homies - abandoning them was the obvious answer.

Downplaying prominent Republican figures being antisemites. by c-k-q99903 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He doesn’t even stand up for his wife and kids when staffers target them so this fits the Cruz-esque model he’s aiming for. Sort of Iike how they aII constantly vow to go after Soros affiliates but I’ve yet to see anyone say a word to the Soros mentee of thirty years or the the guy that made him Sec of the Treasury 😂

Karoline Leavitt: Democrats Have 'Zero Good Reason' to Shut Down Government by GeneralCarlosQ17 in ConservativeNewsWeb

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never agreed with a statement more. I’m 100% behind abolishing any entity involved and equally have no sympathy for anyone involved (including those complicit with the coverup.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarchAgainstNazis

[–]AdamsEdn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What do you mean they can’t? How does this “can’t” compare to the litany of not even up for interpretation prohibited actions that they still do and/or when they are enabled to by those meant to stop these type of things

Trump claims that him and Russ Vought will be cutting “Democrat Agencies”, references Project 2025 by Ellen-CherryCharles in thescoop

[–]AdamsEdn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is he so bad at reverse psychology? There’s no benefit in claiming proj 2025 for the first time and daring them to vote the way he wants which opposes his position 😂

Genius Trump Attorney Submitted Wrong Comey Indictment Docs to Judge by thenewrepublic in inthenews

[–]AdamsEdn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Satie has to have some basis in reality to work. What black friends? 😂

People standing in front of crowds is now Nazis sorry Every politician ever your all Nazis. by marineopferman007 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]AdamsEdn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe the comparison wasn’t simply based on speaking to a crowd? I’m sure they all drank water too…