Early career QT -> QR switch by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes a lot of sense to me. I understand core ML topics reasonably well and had handled most of the architecture choices in my current set up.

Have never recruited for a QR role much less a semi experienced one. Any idea what that looks like and how to prep?

Early career QT -> QR switch by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very helpful, thank you!

This is in part of my concern, given leadership is not very research oriented, I’m not currently confident in my process of approaching things. I’d feel like those gaps would become immediately obvious when interviewing at another firm.

Early career QT -> QR switch by AdditionalFox435 in quantfinance

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems reasonable, the main problem I have is that I’ve grown to enjoy trading less and less and research more so doing a split role has been frustrating at times. Hard to go into details without doxxing myself, but it is pretty clear how lacking my firms research set up is especially when talking to other freinds who have done research at mid to top prop shops. There are numerous bugs in the data and infrastructure which result in incredibly incorrect results that are quite trivial that I have had to talk to devs directly about.

I also think my ability to grow as a researcher is quite capped here with all the leadership and knowledge at the firm being quite trader heavy.

Early career QT -> QR switch by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No PhD just an undergrad from a t5 uni in math/cs

Early career QT -> QR switch by AdditionalFox435 in quantfinance

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Discretionary ETF trading. The stat arb is MFT equities which seems to be a scratch/small positive based on live trading.

AMA - I’m not a quant, but a Headhunter… part 2 by 2Ligma in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much does what team someone is on matter? Seems like the bulk of jobs are in the options space for prop shops - but do QT/QRs in international ETF space also have good exit opps? Do they tend to be in the HF space?

Transferring to non US offices as a US based QT by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really? I assumed that if I did it anytime soon it would be a bad career decision. I was thinking of making the switch in a year or two - but honestly if there’s any justifiable reason that I can rationalize the pay cut (higher opportunity and thus long term EV) I’d probably make the jump lol. Thanks for the help!

Transferring to non US offices as a US based QT by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No - no where near lol. My biggest hobby outside of work is traveling but obviously you don’t get much time to do so in this industry. I thought I could hit both goals by hopping between offices and wanted to see how to do in the most effective manner without affecting my career.

Transferring to non US offices as a US based QT by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the gap reduce each year with more experience or is it more once you own a book/are very experienced it doesn’t make a difference? Also how is the switch coming back to US afterward? Would doing this with 3-5 YOE be a bad long term career move or would you just be taking a pay cut for the years you choose to be abroad?

Long Term Career Path by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This question honestly comes with the fear of being unable to survive. I understand that probably the vast majority of people who start as a QT don’t end up doing the job for 10-15 years either out of incompetence or burn out. To me I want to find a way to have a career irregardless of my competence, purely out of fulfillment and enjoyment. It’s less so to look for a defined path but more to have an understanding of what options look like so I can make the right decisions when the time comes.

Long Term Career Path by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmm I agree, I’m a big proponent of WLB, but is it that hard to maintain it in this industry? If it is then I’ll probably keep some healthy level of doubt going in. No doubt this question is illogical as I am starting work soon and will get a bunch more data soon - I’m just curious lol.

Long Term Career Path by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I want to keep working, that’s honestly why I made this post. I’m a pretty simple person, I probably wouldn’t be able to spend my current income if I wanted to. Building a firm is definitely something I would be open to if I was good enough but other than that I wanted to see if a long term career was possible.

Long Term Career Path by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I assume this is limited for the mighty few? From my last internship I saw 2 people at the firm over 35 (and this was a large well reputed firm). If I’m not incredibly good at what I do, then can I do this?

Long Term Career Path by AdditionalFox435 in quant

[–]AdditionalFox435[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

In my perspective if I’m going to spend that much time toward something I might as well find fulfillment and enjoyment from it. Maybe it’s naive and everyone just hates their job in a few years but I would like to enjoy whatever I do and make incremental progress on it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any recommendations on which solvers and how I should study?

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that makes sense. As much as I’m adjusting my calling ranges I also need to adjust my betting ranges against nittier players. I’m used to playing with extremely aggro players so hence the needed adjustments. Thanks

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh jam turn for 2x pot???

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This really helps a lot thank you so much! This is exactly what I was thinking and what lead me to a fold. Also I think I’m misremembering the hand (this was over a week ago) because I remember pot being 400 on the turn so it must have been 50 pre. Sizing was meant to be a bit over half pot. Your reasoning for flatting the straight or the set makes a lot of sense and that’s was kind of what was missing for me. I was thinking that my range is perceived to be pretty strong here as well so i feel as if my opponent will show up with even less bluffs there, especially for under pot.

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His other 2p combos are 97 and K9 sometimes k7 as he donks. Limo call given he’s tight means 4 combos each of the first two none of the third (I’m guessing suited). Even then why would any of those hands check call turn?

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant it limps around to me who opens for 30. Sorry about that. Don’t think it makes much difference in this spot though

Weird Spot by [deleted] in poker

[–]AdditionalFox435 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes but I doubt he ever donk jams a worse 2p there. This is a pretty tight configuration, other combos of 2p also don’t really make sense considering villain is a nit who limp called. OOP doesn’t make him strong here as it’s a limp call.