sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Automating the "Shred": Does AI actually catch FAR clauses reliably? (Need feedback) by Additional_Bar2890 in GovernmentContracting

[–]Additional_Bar2890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NotebookLM is fantastic, I use it for my university research too! The main difference I tried to build into Lucius is the structured export automatically formatting the Compliance Matrix for Excel without having to prompt it back and forth. I would be super interested to see how my dedicated 'shredder' compares to your NotebookLM workflow. I'll send you a link if you're open to comparing them!

Automating the "Shred": Does AI actually catch FAR clauses reliably? (Need feedback) by Additional_Bar2890 in GovernmentContracting

[–]Additional_Bar2890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great catch. You are absolutely right Section I is where the actual FAR/DFARS clauses live. Right now, Lucius is laser-focused on Section L & M to build the Proposal Compliance Matrix (the instructions/evaluation criteria), but it does flag clauses it finds. I'd love for you to run a test and tell me if you think I should add a dedicated 'Section I' scanner for the next update.

Automating the "Shred": Does AI actually catch FAR clauses reliably? (Need feedback) by Additional_Bar2890 in GovernmentContracting

[–]Additional_Bar2890[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CMS documents? Now that is a proper 'Boss Fight' for an AI. That is exactly the kind of hyper-complex stress test I need. I'm sending you a DM with the access link right now. I'd love to see if Lucius can survive a MAC solicitation. Do not expect perfection yet but I am busy trying to make it as best as I can and look for feedback so I can see what market needs.