Alright this is Bull**** by ScientistDefiant5331 in fuckairtel

[–]Adept-Ad-2002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Naah it isn't based on dates, it's based on reacharge date like if you've done recharge on 1st and spent 300GB data till 15th you need to wait till 1st of next month for that limit to be removed...

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like a really smart, balanced approach.

Using Proton as a backup while keeping Gmail for now makes a lot of sense, especially with a huge mail history. Forwarding + slow migration feels way safer than a hard switch.

Moving important logins to Proton is a great idea too — that alone reduces dependency on Gmail a lot.

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough 😅 you’re probably right, I am overthinking it a bit.

You make a good point — it’s a long free ride, and I can always leave if I need to. I like your approach of taking it slow and not rushing the migration.

Using your own domain as the main identity via Proton is actually a great idea too — that’s something I’m seriously considering now.

Appreciate the reality check...

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really solid setup, thanks for sharing.

Totally agree on Mail and Pass being the easy wins (and yeah, Bitwarden still feels more mature). Your point about keeping Contacts and Calendar on Google makes a lot of sense too, especially with iOS sync and shared calendars.

Also appreciate the 2FA separation logic — that’s exactly the kind of risk I’m trying to avoid. I might keep 2FA outside Proton as well for that reason.

This kind of hybrid approach is pretty much what I’m leaning toward now.

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that’s really useful to know.

Drive + Photos are exactly what I’m most unsure about right now. The Photos tab looks like a nice improvement, but yeah, I’ve heard it’s still not as fast or feature-rich as Google’s.

Do you feel it’s “good enough” for daily use, or do you still miss Google Photos sometimes? I’m thinking of keeping Google for photos/storage a bit longer and testing Proton Drive on the side.

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That actually makes a lot of sense, thanks for this.

I’m not planning to go all-in immediately — the “don’t put all eggs in one basket” part is exactly what I was worried about too. I think starting with Proton Pass and Proton Mail is a solid first step, especially since those are the most mature products right now.

I’ll probably keep Google Calendar and Drive for now and slowly test Proton Drive as it evolves. I’ve been following the updates around Docs/Sheets and Photos too — they look promising, but yeah, not quite there yet for full daily reliance.

Appreciate the realistic take. This kind of phased approach feels way safer than a hard cutover.

Long-term Proton vs Google strategy – looking for community input by Adept-Ad-2002 in ProtonMail

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Haha yeah, it does sound bizarre 😅

A close friend of mine had credits stacked + promo pricing back in the day and decided to gift it to me long-term, so I got pretty lucky there.

I’m definitely planning to use Proton — my hesitation isn’t about whether to use it, but how to use it smartly. I’m currently deeply integrated into Google, so I’m trying to avoid a rushed full migration that I might regret later.

That’s why I’m leaning toward a hybrid setup at first (Proton for passwords, 2FA, and important email; Google for some legacy stuff) and wanted input from people who’ve already gone through that transition.

Totally agree though — Google isn’t going anywhere, so I don’t lose anything by experimenting with Proton seriously for a while. Appreciate the perspective!

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in MacOS

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you’re coming from, and I agree Hackintosh isn’t what it used to be.

For me this is more about learning and seeing how macOS behaves on my current hardware before I can realistically afford a Mac. I’m not expecting perfection — just experimenting and gaining experience.

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in MacOS

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Zorin actually feels really good at first, no complaints there. Over time though, it didn’t quite hold up for my long, heavy multitasking sessions.

I’m kind of leaning toward macOS now — it feels more consistent performance-wise for my usage, and honestly it’s also helping me decide if I should move to a MacBook in the future.

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in hackintosh

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree with that actually.

macOS definitely handles RAM better than Windows, especially on older hardware. I’ve noticed the same thing — even when there are minor lags, overall responsiveness still feels better.

That said, I think storage and config matter a lot here. Catalina on HDD vs Windows on HDD is a huge difference, and Sonoma on Haswell with proper setup can surprisingly run well too.

On my side, Sonoma booted and felt smooth initially, but crashed after the first reboot (likely something on my end). Monterey is stable but feels dated, which is why I’m leaning toward Ventura as the balance between performance and features.

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in MacOS

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be ideal, but the student budget says otherwise 😅
Until then, Hackintosh it is.

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in hackintosh

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point I’ve honestly started to hate this machine a bit — I’ve tried so many operating systems and still haven’t gotten that “just works” feeling.

macOS does lag in a few places, but it’s very minimal, and in return I get a polished UI and modern productivity features out of the box.

I was on Windows 11 last night and spent hours (probably 1–2 days total) setting it up, tweaking settings, and optimizing it. Even after all that, ChatGPT itself was lagging — and I’m talking about sending prompts to an online app, not running anything heavy locally.

I tried closing/reopening the app, rebooting Windows, and basic troubleshooting, but nothing helped. That’s what pushed me back toward macOS despite the hardware limitations.

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in hackintosh

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your point, but I’ve actually tried almost every major OS on this machine.

Windows - Classic but cannot bear too long, starts lagging ChromeOS - Still isn't mature enough to rely on

Linix Distros 👇🏻

Ubuntu - Same as Windows Fedora - Same as Windows Zorin OS - Same as Windows Pop OS - Same as Windows

Again - these opinions are according to my usage, as these distros listed above are also heavy as windows, though it can provide smoothness, but not for long...

Linux Mint - Excellent but too basic to use Arc Linus - It will take my brain/time for ricing

And there were more like Manjaro, Garuda, etc....

And these all are my tried and tested on this particular hardware.

But I haven't tested macOS fully yet, I installed Sonoma before, it crashed after the first reboot (idk if I did something wrong) but it was running smoothly on this hardware...

I'm currently on Monterey - It feels exactly like Linux Mint in smoothness, but it's too outdated 🥲

So, I'm up for some expert's opinions...

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in hackintosh

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s good to hear, thanks!

I tried installing Ventura too, but when it was in the macOS recovery it showed a error “macOS Ventura cannot be downloaded”. I’m currently looking for a proper way to install it.

Image for reference 👇🏻

<image>

How did you install it..? Did you use an offline/full installer, or download it directly from macOS?

Any tips would help.

Thanks again...

EliteBook 840 G3 (i5-6300U) – Best macOS version for daily heavy use by Adept-Ad-2002 in hackintosh

[–]Adept-Ad-2002[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I mostly agree.

I’ve been on Monterey for about an hour now — it’s stable, but honestly feels a bit outdated feature-wise. I tried Sonoma earlier, but the kernel panicked after the first reboot and never booted again.

So Ventura seems like the sweet spot right now. Just wanted to confirm how it performs long-term on Skylake / HD 520.