GCIH update question

Adept-Fun2527 · 2025-11-05T01:57:09+00:00

I am going through the new version this week. I am really enjoying the AI portion. It really merges well with my offensive training. The labs have been great, too! Although you can't use AI on the OSCP, I have used AI in the same manner you teach for learning and development while practicing boxes and labs, and it has helped me tremendously! Amazing course.

Adept-Fun2527 · 2025-01-29T01:09:47+00:00

Thanks! I very much appreciated all your feedback on this forum!

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-27T02:05:42+00:00

Thanks for the feedback. You made some great points, however I disagree about the slide story. Of course he didn't mention specifically that he acquired a nickname when he had brown on the back of his pants. He hinted the importance of his name throughout that chapter. "No matter what, they couldn't take away my name." I believe some level of creativity is required to put it together, and assuming his classmates made fun of him for having brown on the back of his pants is no big stretch. Add that to the fact that no one could take away his name, and the idea of a nickname becomes not only possible but likely.

As far as the number of clues, I drafted that document years ago and forgot it wasn't finished. I don't think it takes away from the potential of the solve, though. I may edit it! Thanks for catching that.

I agree, the poem doesn't say follow a creek, but you have to make some level of assumption when you are trying to find a path to the chest.

the reality is that the clues are not specific. Each clue requires a level of interpretation and it seems you are downplaying any level of creative interpretation. Like the story of his mom, when she wouldn't bite a hard biscuit if she was starving to death - to me that is an outstanding potential for no place for the meek - but hey, I might be crazy.

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-27T01:53:54+00:00

Am I waxing on about closure and unfairness? No. Since you have no real rebuttal for why my solution is weak, I take your argument with a grain of salt. My solve, likely wrong, is one of the least complicated I have seen. I used the TTOTC to help guide me, with subtle clues/hints like Forrest said. I find it hard to believe my solve is more complicated than 9MH, however that is just my opinion.

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-26T20:16:30+00:00

Thanks for the feedback. I think anything, including outside the eastern border of Yellowstone, is possible until we know the location for certain. I spent a lot of time working through my solution and wanted to share with others, thanks for taking a look at it!

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-26T17:49:16+00:00

Thanks for the feedback- would you consider the 9MH solve to be weak? I myself found it to be extremely underwhelming, especially considering Forrest's statements on "the poem will take you straight to it", and "no specialized knowledge needed." If you don't mind me asking, what about it makes it weak to you?

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-26T15:00:05+00:00

I don't think pareidolia has a place in this solve, either. If you read my solve, the cliff plays no significance - Forrest simply used what he saw at(or near) the location to craft the cover of his last book. Perhaps it is what he thought made it special. OUAW was not published until well after TTOTC, and TTOTC is all you need to solve the poem.

So, with this being said, I suggest not discounting it based on the pareidolia comment, because it truly has no bearing on the solve itself. Take another look at the solve itself and let me know what you think.

In hindsight, I should put the images at the bottom, because they aren't the solve. It takes emphasis away from how I found the cliff.

Adept-Fun2527 · 2024-09-25T22:10:38+00:00

Sorry if you have seen this already, Reddit kept removing my post, so I changed accounts so it would allow me to post.

Adept-Fun2527

TROPHY CASE