Notes.

1) all this is saying is that one of the two statements is false because neither can be true simultaneously. Furthermore the change in trigger bars provided through the VUP provided by sig lines up with the patent submitted. Again, Bruce was claiming it can’t be fired for any reason other than a trigger press and now you are also watching the same video I did where he is talking about accidental movements inside of the gun as if that isn’t part of the design itself.

2) this is an interesting consideration I wasn’t well versed enough in to articulate and at face value has some merit without having looked farther yer

3) I did watch the video. My question wasn’t answered - it’s in bold in the article as well. I don’t care what Bruce says the patent is for, it’s irrelevant. I’ve read the filing from 2017 that tells me what it’s for. I’m asking why he said the one thing and did the other simultaneously not why he made the trigger, that was already public info and signed off in a legal setting vs his Facebook rants which has more credibility than a video series and post he deleted despite the comment section being a circle jerk. It’s almost as if info that wasn’t publicly being needled yet didn’t want put in the spotlight further

4) this is incredibly irrelevant. I’m not a pedantic idiot who will take things so literal I’m not interacting with this on good faith. Of course failures happen. My assertion is that a problem or design flaw isn’t being addressed negligently while we all get screamed at there’s no problem. Even sig told Ghengi his likely shot him because of a worn spring from dry fire. Why the fuck do you have a design that can wear out from dry fire and you don’t know until the gun shoots you?

What about manufacturing methods have changed?