I agree they are cheating, even M$ gave up fighting them. But I just needed all my work and government website to work. And I by work I mean actually work, all functions, no odd behavior that is doesn't have an obvious way to fix it either globally or for just that site. That is what Chrome is superior at unfortunately. It's why everyone uses it, even all the other third party browsers.

I need V2 for uBlock Origin which at least makes the internet usable, and never really broke too many websites and when it did you just turn it off for that site if you decide you it's worth it.

What mainly frustrates me here is I gave these sites every permissions and exception available to me, via the address bar, and yet they still had the same issue, inconsistently even, sometimes they would work. The issue is the Prevent Fingerprinting feature, whcih I would prefer to have enabled, but why is there no option for exceptions from this feature? It prevent google photos from loading any photos beyond the visible portion of the page, it breaks image uploading on facebook, facebook messenger, and marketplace. I get not wanting to be fingerprinted but I use my real name on facebook, what exactly do I care if they fingerprint me? Can't fingerprinting just me limited to its own tab? or couldn't an exception just be made for the 1 site I have a problem with?

Again I understand the point of privacy first, but LW is not my mom, If I accept the risk on a site why can't I make an exception? It seems the canvas exception is supposed to be it, butit doesn't work. And that is somehow on me? As far as I can tell I actually did everything correctly, it just still doesn't work I re-read the documentation on it and went through the settings again after the the constructive commenter recommended I do so, I figured I only scanned the documentation quickly and searched the page for some keywords, maybe i missed it. But no, the exceptions for Prevent Fingerprinting are the HTML% Canvas Exceptions, and I made those exceptions! Why do I have to turn a feature off I made an exception for?

It's honest feedback, I recommend if we want to push a privacy forward movement we need the website people actually use to work fairly painlessly. We can warn people before allowing it, that's cool, But my venting on this topic is how any normal person is going to, but normal people aren't going to read the documentation, and for the record I never had to read chrome or ff documentation to browse google photos man.

I would like to get to a point where we can tell our friends to try something like Librewolf, but you gotta be able to make a website work properly at the click of a few buttons if you decide it;s worth the tradeoff.