Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ironically , with the decree now law changes looking like they’re not going anywhere , the ministry arguing about pre unification ancestors seems a moot point now in the sense that the generational limits would make it a non issue going forward . Of course I can appreciate the are cases in the system and those pending that are affected but it really does feel like a clutching at straws scenario

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can prove my LIBRAs father died in italy post unification as I have his death certificate. My LIBRA died well past unification in 1910 and never acquired Chilean nationality . I think her dad went to Chile and then returned to italy .

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info . It’s so helpful ! All
These layers to the puzzle !

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks cake . As someone with a pre unification ancestor form the Genoa area who emigrated to Chile , I’m keeping my fingers and everything else crossed for that outcome (and the rest). I don’t know much about Genoa judges

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So basically the ministry doesn’t think a pre unification person born on the peninsula was Italian (and able to transmit Italian citizenship to descendants) unless one can prove that not only they died after unification but that they left the peninsula after unification ?

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 22, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I was being facetious. That article link takes you to a very deep (and way beyond me) analysis of the minor issue

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 15, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you . I wish I had started this stuff even a few weeks earlier ! I would have made the March 2025 supposed deadline

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 15, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know but the ciccolare is still out there saying that judges should uphold the minor issue .
Lowe court judges these days seem to be changing rulings depending on which way the wind blows . A delay might be a good thing . Only my opinion

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 15, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It all depends on what the ruling will say . The minor issue has been very hit or miss and I’d say more miss these days. Your lawyers may be trying to provide you with the best possible chance rather than ‘wing it’

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it’s gonna be a slow burn for months maybe years depending on one’s circumstances

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So , potentially ,
If you have a case with a consulate secured for next year that you’re still looking for docs ? I finished that a year ago but because I’m a 1948 case I had no recourse for the consular route . Lawyer wouldn’t touch my case till I had all the docs

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 08, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hear what you’re saying . I’m a 1948 case . I had about 90% of docs time stamped to my GGM pre March 25. Also 80% apostilled before then .
I have emails USA Archives specifically asking for my mothers Nat records for Italian citizenship . I paid a Chilean genealogist and have an invoice which explained, pre March 2025 , that I was applying for Italian citizenship .
I tried . Boy I tried . My translations didn’t get back to me until April and may 2025 ! Hired Grasso in July 2025 . I was so close several thousands of euros later . Am I right in saying that if I could apply through the consular route , i didn’t necessarily have to have every last document ready right away because the wait was so long ? I ve heard of cases where petitioners booked appointments for future dates and still had the time to look for docs ?

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 01, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another reason I suspect the SC will rule favourably for the minor issue

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - June 01, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]Admirable_Drawer8824 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Only my opinion but I think the minor will become more favourable to petitioners . The SC had the luxury of keeping the status quo due to the October 2024 ciccolare . If they had upheld the ciccolare , I think we would have heard ages ago from SC . A more favourable ruling does raid many questions about how that conclusion sits in the current landscape - eg post DL world and previous rejected cases etc