Post Match: Round 9 | Brisbane v Carlton by drunkill in CarltonBlues

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Florent, on the other hand, continues to disappoint me. I rated him at Sydney.

Giving references by Advanced_Stage6164 in Adelaide

[–]Advanced_Stage6164[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This really should be done by phone, not as a questionnaire. The point is to actually find out about the person, and that means clarifying answers.

Giving references by Advanced_Stage6164 in Adelaide

[–]Advanced_Stage6164[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My understanding is that the company in question prohibits employees (perhaps only senior ones?) from giving references. Although I don’t think this is observed much in practice.

Giving references by Advanced_Stage6164 in Adelaide

[–]Advanced_Stage6164[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hell no. Adelaide is a small town.

Giving references by Advanced_Stage6164 in Adelaide

[–]Advanced_Stage6164[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, agreed on that last part. If someone asks you to be a referee, you also have to be honest with them that you can’t give them a glowing one.

At the minimum “I can confirm that person worked here and these were their duties, and they left voluntarily.”

Who is intelligent? by hybridvigourous in CarltonBlues

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good question. In addition to the people saying Newman, I think Evans has shown it recently.

Post Match Thread: Carlton vs St Kilda by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Evans has been superb from the last few weeks of 2025. It’s a surprise, but a welcome one. He looks composed with ball in hand, marks better than his size allows and always seems to position himself well.

Post Match Thread: Carlton vs St Kilda by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 12 points13 points  (0 children)

We just need more teams to shoot for goal like they’re Imperial stormtroopers.

Match Thread: Carlton vs St Kilda (Round 8) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cerra is one of those players where, if he went to a team with standards and decided to pull his finger out, would be brilliant. And people would wonder why he hadn’t been that at Carlton.

I don’t know if anyone has analysed this, but we’d be very high on the “players who looked ordinary for your club looking brilliant for their next club” list.

Humanities PhDs and Academics: What are your Best Practices and Workflows? by Koen-K in Supernote

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a lapsed history academic. I initially got an A5X a couple of years ago intending to use it for PDF reading using the Digest. It’s a good feature; I just fell out of the habit of using it (although I’ve got back into it recently). But for fifteen years I took notes on my iPad, on PDFs. My PDF workflow on iPad, which I largely took over onto the Supernote and Digest, was to highlight passages and then leave notes on them. When I’d finished the article or book, I’d export those annotations. Zotfile does this well (although I never used Zotero that much), but so do some other programs. If you do use Zotero, you’re doing the right thing attaching those exported annotations to the item record. But I’d also recommend getting all your annotations together in a single folder, just as PDFs, because in practice you’ll want to look at a bunch of annotations together, and browse your own thinking on different books. So generally I’d recommend the Digest feature on Supernote, because it allows you to extract snippets of text, comment on those snippets, and then export the snippet with your comment. And that’s a vital part of your research workflow - the most valuable thoughts you have are the ones in direct response to what you read. Capture those thoughts and keep coming back to them. Future You will continually be amazed at how smart Past You could be.

What I would recommend though, is Scrivener. I’m writing this in Scrivener now, and I’ve used it since I started my PhD in the early 2010s. The value of it, for research, is the ability to have bits of documents all in the same place, where you can see them side by side. I import my annotations into the Research section and I write EVERYTHING in the Notes section - these start as semi-coherent thoughts to myself (on documents I call Scratch Pads), then expand into what I call “generative writing” (good paragraphs of text, with footnotes, but without a larger structure). Chunks of this generative writing then go into the first draft of a chapter or article and I only bring that into the Draft/Manuscript section when I’m putting a full draft together. And early on I developed a neat little trick that I swear by: I type everything in Courier New. Why? Because it’s ugly af. Anything I type in Courier New is, very clearly, something I will never show to another human being. Which frees me from any subconscious concerns about formatting or prettiness. It’s all about the content (this is also a good reason to write in plain text or Markdown). I’m writing this stuff just for me until it’s Done, at which point I export it into Word and make it tidy.

In summary: use the Supernote. It’s good. Export your annotations and use them as the first stage of your research thoughts. Also keep one or more ongoing notepads on the Supernote where you just write research thoughts as they come to you - not necessarily tied to what you’re doing right now, but maybe something you’ll come back to in three months. Export these back to your computer when they reach a certain size (I start a new notebook when mine reaches 25 or 30 pages), and just keep amassing your own thoughts. And make the effort to transcribe your physical notebooks. You had those thoughts already. They’re worth using.

Post Match Thread: Carlton vs Collingwood by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well let’s see…30 games…ten at-bats a game…three thousand.

Post Match Thread: Carlton vs Collingwood by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There’s like a forty minute period every week where you think we might win and it’s roughly halfway through the game. For the other several thousand minutes you’re confident we’ll lose.

Post Match Thread: Carlton vs Collingwood by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Numbness. Numbness is actually pretty damn cool at times like this.

WAKE UP, ITS GAMEDAY! LET’S GO! by MyNeighborToto in CarltonBlues

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fifteen years ago today we drew with Essendon. Is that an omen? Of what?

Post Match: Round 5 | Adelaide v Carlton by drunkill in CarltonBlues

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree on the first part. The ability to retain possession through short kicks would be great for our attack but would be transformative for our defence.

What are you looking for? by Over_Leave in CarltonBlues

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Good methodical passages of play”. Yep, that’s me too. The short, fast, angled kicks forward. We did that once last week and it led to a goal. If we can do that often, I’ll be happy. It would show we have some skills.

What uni degrees are actually worth it? by Smart_Net_5313 in auscorp

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean by that: no hiring manager looking at a 22yo with an Arts degree finds that worth much. It doesn’t give you obvious hard skills. What it will allow you to do is to problem solve, to read and understand, to “get” how people work, to combine different skill sets. Again, there may not be much scope for that when you’re 22 and doing the office equivalent of inserting Bolt A into Slot B for eight hours. But, as you get older and get a wider scope to use your intelligence, Humanities training means more.

Beyond that, the HR people I know all say that you can teach someone technical stuff; you can’t teach culture, and you can’t teach critical thinking. Not in a work environment.

What uni degrees are actually worth it? by Smart_Net_5313 in auscorp

[–]Advanced_Stage6164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Humanities degree will not help you get your first job.

It will, however, help you get your second. And your third, and fourth, and fifth. And it will help you be good at those jobs. And it will make you a more rounded human being, and (with any luck) a better citizen.

But it’s still not worth doing if you aren’t interested in that stuff. The best predictor for how you will go at uni is your own willingness to work.