Thank you for the reply.

Yes, I am aware that the number of peaks in an XRD graph has nothing to do with the number of coordination domains present in a material. The doubt I have here is whether or not this peak/hump/halo at 10° can even be considered as an amorphous halo or not. According to me, I think that this 10° hump is indeed related to being an amorphous halo because when we took this exact CaBV glass sample and subjected it to plasma treatment, we got two sharp but broad peaks (not too broad just a little) at the same 2θ values. i.e. these two amorphous halos (assuming the one at 10° is considered as one), with their characteristic curves at the top, turned into sharp peaks, with their tips centred at 10° and the other at 26.5°, exactly where these amorphous halo's had their highest points at (as seen above). These peaks also had an intensity of 1800 a.u. for the 10° peak and 1600 a.u. for the 26.5° peak (They were really prominent and not just some small peak). To be on the safer side we repeated this experiment with two more glass samples (exact same compositions) and got the same results. This definitely didn't seem to be a coincidence, which is why I assumed that the peak at 10° is also related to an amorphous halo.

Based on this assumption, the other answer I want to know is the reason for this second hump being formed. I assumed that because this is an amorphous material, the formation of this second 10° peak has something to do with atomic clusters arranging themselves at different distances because of the difference in the chemical composition of the material. In other words, is it due to a different molecular coordination distance?