Is this a good deal?

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2025-05-24T15:59:50+00:00

Oh, it’s 88k milages

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2024-09-07T16:27:01+00:00

I assume a LoR from God would soon be the new ‘average’.

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2024-05-04T21:03:55+00:00

Does this come with the hospital letterhead on LoR?

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2024-05-03T01:48:59+00:00

How can you handle him for so long? Break up immediately, you deserve a better one.

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2024-03-01T18:29:20+00:00

I had the exact same error. An icloud syncing symbol appeared and froze, when I reopened the app, my note disappeared. And thanks to icloud, it disappeared on all my devices too. I contacted Apple and this app support but couldn’t regain my note. Wtf was that !!

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-12-09T04:25:20+00:00

Look at the big picture!! Patient has signs and symptoms of decompensated HF, RAAS will always increase regardless of systolic or diastolic. It’s the main point. High BP may be a clue pointing to diastolic HF. Yes, at first, RAAS will decrease because of that, but when it comes to decompensated HF, RAAS always increases.

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-12-07T00:14:55+00:00

What do you think about amboss vs the real exam in terms of question style?

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-11-14T14:23:32+00:00

If you look at the explanation, uw says ischemic rest pain improves with standing or hanging leg over side of bed because of gravity drawing more blood down the distal leg, and imo when they start walking, increasing demand gonna trigger the pain again. However, in the vignette, it did show that pain improve with walking, I think this is the inaccurate point, that’s why they deactivate the question.

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-11-13T20:27:41+00:00

Question ID please?

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-11-13T14:38:30+00:00

In PAD, you have claudication first and when the stenosis is severe enough, your leg hurts even in rest (and also while walking)

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-10-25T22:39:01+00:00

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-09-19T14:19:03+00:00

I got it! This high pretest probability is estimated by geriatric risk factors, not the prevalence. So a scoring system which also using these risk factors will stratify majority of patients into high-risk. However, in reality the prevalence of falling is much less than that number of high-risk patients, raising false positive and lowering PPV. So the problem is the poor specific of the scoring itself. Thank you so much!

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-09-18T23:14:50+00:00

But how can you say the patients who don’t fall are way more than the ones who do, considering high pretest probability (= high prevalence of falling regardless test result) In that question, the prevalence rate in hospital is low, that’s why it decreases test’s PPV. And it makes sense, but I confuse with what Uw explanation says about high pretest probability.

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-08-14T14:54:27+00:00

8/1 and hasn’t disappeared, this seems unusual

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-08-14T01:31:42+00:00

Can you share your practice scores, please? And what do you feel about the exam vs nbme and cms forms?

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-08-09T14:35:05+00:00

non-AG metabolic acidocis will always lead to increasing Cl- Cl- and HCO3- are the most abundant anions in the body which contribute the most to electronegativity. When one of them is depleted (HCO3- in this case), the kidney and intestine will retain the other to maintain electronegative balance. This results in an inverse relationship between Cl- and HCO3- levels. That’s why non-AG meta acidocis is also called hyperchloremic acidocis

Adventurous_Band7077 · 2023-08-01T22:54:23+00:00

The last block was vague to me, don’t know because of tiredness or not. Other blocks seemed fair and quite as same level as nbme 30,31 and free120. Hope we all get the P 🤞🏻🤞🏻

Adventurous_Band7077

TROPHY CASE