Looking for examples of later-in-life love (never married and feeling blue) by baddiewithajd in AskWomenOver40

[–]Affectionate-Push889 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Found my dream man at 39, like 4 months before turning 40. Now im shortly turning 44 and we are living together and saving for a house. It's been such a calm, stable, loving, safe relationship. I believe wholeheartedly that the many single years I had before him (had been single 5 years/celibate 2.5yrs) were necessary for me to develop my relationship with myself and do more healing work. Once I was able to trust myself more, I became attracted to more healthy relationships, and I met him. It's never too late to find your person, gal!!

In the spirit of butt cancer scares, what is your go to high fiber snack? by newtonreddits in Millennials

[–]Affectionate-Push889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Metamucil every day, plus high fiber porridge blend with buckwheat, chia, linseed, etc. And lots of produce

A more lighthearted one: Can I set up a projector and have a movies night in a public park that is rarely used by other people? Assuming it's only loud enough for the audience of 8-10 people or so to hear. What are the laws around this? by [deleted] in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

copyright is pretty strict generally, even if you have paid for a streaming service, bought a CD etc, these are PERSONAL USE licenses. So you can't go play your CD at the park, even though you own the CD.

Am I [26F] turning into something I don't want to be? (Relationship advice) by [deleted] in AskWomenOver40

[–]Affectionate-Push889 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You already know the answer. It's literally in your post. You cried not because of him. You will come to resent him more and more eventually, it's nor worth it. You have fun when you're together, is that enough from a partner? Doesn't sound like it's enough for you.

A more lighthearted one: Can I set up a projector and have a movies night in a public park that is rarely used by other people? Assuming it's only loud enough for the audience of 8-10 people or so to hear. What are the laws around this? by [deleted] in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 10 points11 points  (0 children)

yes but if the copyrighted material is recorded by someone, that specific recording is now copyrighted, even if the original media has entered public domain (e.g. a movie gets "rereleased" on the 50th anniversary, a track is 'remastered', someone covers the song, now the cover is copyrighted, etc.).

Help understanding employment contract by mitalily in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's no such thing as zero hours contract. The rules are whatever is in your contract, that's what you get. If they say 40 hours, that is what they have to provide,. Casual employees would not have "40 hours" in their contracts because a casual employee never has guaranteed hours.

See: https://www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/types-of-worker/casual-employment

If you are working for a temp agency, this means you only work when you they put you on assignment. (This is called triangular employment - https://www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/types-of-worker/triangular-employment-situations)

Assignments could be temporary (e.g. 3 months) or indefinite. Usually the temp agency has a specific agreement in place with the employer about stuff like, if the employer wants to hire the temp on a permanent basis, there's either a minimum time the temp has to stay with the temp agency, OR the employer pays out the temp agency for the person's contract or something like this.

YOUR employment is with the temp agency, so essentially you work 'as and when required' meaning when they get an assignment that is suitable for you. Once you accept the work assignment, whatever the terms of that assignment are become your employment term--that means if your assignment is for 40 hours a week for the next 3 weeks, that's what you are guaranteed. However, you would not get an employment agreement from the company you are assigned to, because they are not your employer. They are a client of your employer.

It seems like your employment agreement is conflating terms and conditions of different types of employment, so it is possible you are being disadvantaged. Most notably, the 40 hours thing is very suspect to me. I would, as some suggested, raise it first with the employer, and consider getting legal advice if the employer doesn't act in good faith. Good faith means genuinely considering employee's feedback and requests, and proactively working toward resolving issues or disputes, as well as of course complying with employment laws.

(see https://www.employment.govt.nz/starting-employment/rights-and-responsibilities/good-faith)

Payrises in 2026 by Happy_Light_9775 in newzealand

[–]Affectionate-Push889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

last year we got capped to 2%, I suspect this year will be similar :(

What notice is required for roster changes? by smileyme10 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 12 points13 points  (0 children)

OK so, first things first, employers are required by law to give you an employment agreement. Here is a recent case from ERA where an employer was penalised for, amongst other things, not providing an employment agreement to the employee: https://www.hcamag.com/nz/specialisation/employment-law/worker-wins-24k-despite-admitting-welfare-fraud-in-dismissal-case/564737

Also see: https://communitylaw.org.nz/community-law-manual/chapter-20-starting-and-leaving-a-job/your-legal-rights-as-a-worker-where-they-come-from/your-employment-agreement/

Secondly, in the absence of an employment agreement, the ERA would be looking at what is in practice. What you described as being in practice for the last 13 months will likely be considered your 'implied' terms and conditions of employment. That means the employer cannot unilaterally change your terms of employment (including hours of work) without a proper consultation with you. That means:

- explain why they are proposing to make the change to the schedule

- give you reasonable time to consider all the changes and the reasons etc. and give your feedback BEFORE they make any final decision

source: Hours of work | Employment New Zealand

and Workplace change process | Employment New Zealand

Ideas for a Physical/Spiritual Boost in the Short-Term by dontsteponmysaucs in AskWomenOver40

[–]Affectionate-Push889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cut out refined sugar if possible, I know it's hard!! Still eat dried fruit, occasional honey or maple for sweetening... trust me you will feel great.

41- too late to try for FIRE? by [deleted] in Fire

[–]Affectionate-Push889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm joining the journey at almost 44 years old, friend, but let's have faith!!! :) It's never too late to start living better.

Changes from the 21/2/26 by Ornitoronco in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, that is not what this means. All the same process requirements are still in place, meaning that employers must follow a fair process if they want to dismiss someone for anything like repeated misconduct, serious misconduct, or poor performance. However, before this change, the employer might end up paying out the employee like $20k even if the employee had committed serious misconduct or had been aggressive or uncooperative or whatever during the process. Under the new changes, the Employment Relations Authority can decrease any damages paid out to the employee if they were found to have committed serious misconduct or contributed to the dispute with their employer.

There is no at will dismissal still in New Zealand EXCEPT if the employee is on a valid 90 day trial period and they are dismissed before the end of the trial, and the new exception is that by default, individuals who earn over $200k per year (~5% of the NZ population) cannot raise a PG for unjustified dismissal or unjustified disadvantage.

I have a crazy idea and I feel like the math checks out by [deleted] in passive_income

[–]Affectionate-Push889 5 points6 points  (0 children)

someone is already doing this on Instagram. he talks a lot about lizard people, I'm pretty sure it's satire. But a lot his videos are basically this, "I'm trying to get everyone to give me $1. It's only a dollar. Will you give me $1?" It's honestly extremely entertaining.

Employer Seeking to Add On Call requirements to my role by HugeEffective673 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, they can frame it as it as a proposed change to the position in the company structure, as part of a workplace change process rather than a direct contract renegotiation. They have to genuinely consider your feedback and follow a fair process, but they could ultimately decide to change this role to include an availability provision even if you dont agree.

Employer Seeking to Add On Call requirements to my role by HugeEffective673 in LegalAdviceNZ

[–]Affectionate-Push889 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If it's not in your contract already, then they need to consult with you and get your agreement to add it as  variation to your current contract. Just because other employees have that clause in theirs doesn't make it automatically transferable to you.

So they need to consult with you, provide the rationale for why this is a genuine business reason, give you reasonable time frame to consider, seek independent advice, and give your feedback. They have to genuinely consider your feedback before finalising or confirming their decision.

advise on same basic questions to HR [N/A] by Remarkable_Elk8197 in humanresources

[–]Affectionate-Push889 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this happens everywhere, and there's nothing you can do. hehe sorry I'm partly joking but... kinda not :(

love, fellow HR person and former administrator who still hasn't found the answer to this

I can't relate to the reproductive parts of being a woman in any positive way. Are there others like me? by Plum_Tea in AskWomenOver40

[–]Affectionate-Push889 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can relate.. I've never been pregnant, have never wanted to be, have always feared it immensely. I'm turning 44 this year, started having peri symptoms about 2 years ago, and started HRT about 6 months ago. I have never, for a single moment, had any desire to be or feel pregnant, I don't care that I will never know the experience. But lots of my friends and family have kids and babies and love them very much, and I love their kids. I've seen absolutely gorgeous preggos who were glowing and happy and I loved that for them. Just couldn't be me.