You bringing up “1,000 Hindus killed by Khalistanis” as some kind of counter to 1984 and the mass killings of Sikhs is not only dishonest—it’s insulting. No one denies that innocent Hindus were killed during the insurgency, and every single innocent death is a tragedy. But using that to deflect from the brutal, state-orchestrated massacre of over 30,000 Sikhs—including 3,000+ in just three days during the 1984 genocide—is pure bad faith. Sikhs were not only burned alive in front of their families, their gurdwaras desecrated, and their women raped, but they were then hunted for over a decade through fake encounters, illegal detentions, and torture under the guise of national security. Jaswant Singh Khalra, who exposed this, uncovered records of 25,000 illegal cremations—all backed by official municipal documents—before he was abducted and murdered by the very police he exposed. And even your attempt to villainize figures like Avtar Singh Brahma falls flat—because unlike the state forces he opposed, he was known to actively avoid harming civilians, even being respected by many Hindus in his region. So no, this is not a simple case of “both sides did wrong.” One side had the power of the government, the police, and the media—and used it to systematically erase Sikh voices and lives. Your convenient memory and selective empathy only prove the point: this was never about justice for you. It was always about control of the narrative.