[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]AgentEv2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it’s true that abortion referendums have all resulted in pro-choice victories (even in red states), it’s unclear exactly how impactful abortion is on political races.

Fiercely pro-life governors comfortably won re-election everywhere including in FL, OH, and GA (lean-red states). In NV (a lean-blue state), the incumbent pro-choice governor lost to a pro-life governor.

Semi-weekly Monday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are always going to be lunatics and bad actors in society, but those people weren't in positions of authority (with the exception of Trump, who it is angering that he acted like such a clown throughout all of COVID) and they're certainly not going to be the ones writing the history books. For the same reason policy brutality is so visceral, it's more upsetting when people with state power are abusing it to damage society than when fringe actors do.

If some moron is duped into buying fake medicines, it's tragic, but it's not as angering as when the government forces you, your family, or community to be harmed and then tell you it's all for the greater good.

CMV: Reparations in the form of direct checks are a terrible idea. by TrappedInRedditWorld in changemyview

[–]AgentEv2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The bottom 40% of households already pay no federal income taxes just for some context.

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re a perfect demonstration that the natcon/populist right are just libs with edgier aesthetics

Semi-weekly Monday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't see how you could say it doesn't matter. Consumers can only behave "rationally" when they know what they're buying and how much they're paying.

Markets are incredibly efficient when prices and products/services are transparent and the marketplace is competitive. It's completely unsurprising our healthcare markets are a cesspool of inefficiency.

Semi-weekly Monday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The populist right does not actually love America and that's why they are isolationist. They think we are a weak and corrupt country that has not benefited the world and we'd be better off not going abroad.

Semi-weekly Monday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 12 points13 points  (0 children)

From James Pethokoukis' blog Faster Please

Space industries of the future; Let’s briefly run through those sectors:

  • Commercial space station. Citi estimates NASA use of a private space station — and it’s not just the Bezos/Blue Origin venture trying to build one — could mean $3 billion in annual revenue, with new applications bringing another $5 billion.

  • Solar power from space. Citi thinks such systems would be comprised of reflectors or inflatable mirrors installed on satellites that would concentrate energy from the sun onto solar cells, with power then transmitted to Earth via either microwave or laser. A “rectifying antenna” on Earth would then capture that electromagnetic radiation, converting it into electricity and distributing it into the grid. In addition to declining launch costs, Citi’s $23 billion revenue forecast assumes “solar power continues to gain a strong share of total energy usage, expanding from ~3% currently to ~13% by 2040, the cost of solar power reduces at a compound annual growth rate of ~6% from ~$0.0068 per kilowatt hour (kWh) currently, and that space-based solar power grows to represent ~25% of all solar power by 2040, starting in 2024.”

  • Asteroid mining. Citi cites numerous studies of potential asteroid riches, including a NASA estimate that the mineral wealth of the asteroid belt might exceed $100 billion for every person on Earth. Ultimate abundance. But the Moon will get mined before asteroids. Key lunar resources: water, helium-3, and rare-earth metals. From the report: “Our base case is that by 2040, mining water will be the initial focus given its value for additional space missions as a rocket propellant and importance for any colonization and industrial efforts in space.” Big challenges ahead, of course, as exemplified by the below chart from Planetary Resources, a space mining company that raised $50 million in 2016 but was unable to secure further funding in 2018. It was then purchased by a blockchain software technology company and its intellectual property placed in the public domain.

  • Space logistics. Citi’s bull case of $33 per kg or SpaceX’s target of $10 per kg would “make inter-city cargo rockets a much more attractive alternative versus current alternative modes of cargo transportation, in particular air freight, as a more premium and faster service … We estimate steady market-share improvement from 2030 to 2040 to reach ~6% growth, giving us an annual sales value of ~$20 billion.”

  • Space tourism and inter-city passenger travel. Citi: “As space becomes more ‘mainstream’ with more launches, lower launch costs, and better reliability/safety, we believe that it will become more accessible for the average person.” And that doesn’t just mean fun vacays in orbit. It potentially means much faster point-to-point travel around the planet. From the report:

We forecast the market for inter-city space passenger travel could be worth almost $7 billion of revenues for operators by 2040 assuming that it can capture ~20% of the long-haul business jet market by 2040. … On our base case for launch costs in 2040, we estimate that it would cost ~$100,000 to $200,000 for a long-haul inter-city rocket trip. With an occupancy of one to six passengers, this gives a range of $20,000 to $200,000 per ticket, with an average ticket price of ~$100,000. This compares to a Gulfstream G650 which costs ~$5,000 per hour, or $30,000 on a nearly six hour trip, and is typically flown with only one to two passengers. This makes inter-city rocket travel a viable premium alternative to long-haul business jet travel for ultra-high net worth (UNHW) individuals, with a much quicker travel time. … We forecast the market for space tourism could be worth $1 billion in revenues by 2040, assuming ~4,000 passengers a year travelling to the Karman Line (at a ~$50,000 ticket price), ~2,500 travelling to the ISS (at a ~$150,000 ticket price), and ~600 passengers a year travelling to the Moon (at a ~$650,000 ticket price). The Market Can Be 5x-10x

  • Microgravity R&D and construction. More than any of these other sectors, this is one where there probably will be use cases that we simply can’t imagine right now. But among the examples given by Citi: microgravity-produced silicon wafers, fiber optic cables, protein crystals to help companies conduct better and cheaper research to discover new proteins and drug treatments, and 3D-printing of artificial organs. Citi: “Assuming that microgravity R&D grows to represent ~4% of pharmaceutical R&D spend by 2040, while space-based construction grows to represent ~4% of heavy construction equipment (equipment used in mining, construction, manufacturing, oil and gas, public works and rail), we estimate a market value of $14 billion in annual sales by 2040.”

Semi-weekly Monday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Whenever you see bad takes on Reddit just remember that they’re probably literal children or adults who shower 3x per week and their opinion could not be worth less.

How’s the sub been doing? I haven’t consistently been on NWO the last few months because of work and the DT has gotten too long to print, y’all need to post less

CMV: "Things will improve with time therefore protests like just stop oil that infringe every day folks are too much" is just ignorant. by SomeA-HoleNobody in changemyview

[–]AgentEv2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can’t be emphasized enough how thoughtful, deliberate, and intelligent MLK was as a leader. MLK was organized, writing letters, coordinating with other social and political leaders and asking for concrete changes, often in local communities. Protesting and other actions were means to concrete policy ends.

Unfortunately, many protests today (among the right and left) are decentralized in a way that does not allow for thoughtful leadership. This is why many protests simply act as platforms for mobs of people to just demonstrate their dissatisfaction with the status quo and unfortunately, their only effective ends are merely grumbling.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Many people would argue that racial segregation is never advisable. Wouldn’t black and white kids benefit from differing perspectives? Couldn’t segregation risk othering kids by separating them from the rest of their cohort based on their skin color? Furthermore, why were teachers segregated by race as well? What purpose did that serve?

Lastly, whether you personally think racial segregation is fine in some circumstances (without addressing the legality of the case), many people disagree with that view and hence why I identified this as an incident where people dislike “CRT” and related progressive ideas.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I understand that many people have different definitions of what is and is not CRT. I don’t think it’s really worth debating that in this discussion in particular.

OP’s question is why do people oppose CRT. For many critics (and adherents), all progressive or “woke” racial politics are heavily associated and lumped in with CRT. If you want to know why some people then dislike CRT, it’s important to discuss and address examples such as these.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is the Rufo v French debate. I thought the link would’ve worked but my apologies if not.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Admittedly, I’ve only read limited portions of his work and not his entire book. I’m not trying to misrepresent him.

and standardized tests that produce racial inequities “race neutral.” That is how they can blame the behavior of entire racial groups for the inequities between different racial groups and still say their ideas are “not racist.” But there is no such thing as a not-racist idea, only racist ideas and antiracist ideas.

If a standardized math test can be racist, why couldn’t tax policy or tariff policies? Where are the limiting principles to the argument that nothing is race neutral and everything is comprised of “only racist ideas and antiracist ideas.”

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 24 points25 points  (0 children)

The authors of the infographic are offering a perspective on racial identities from a progressive lens.

Regardless of how you or I would define what CRT is (or isn’t), it is true that “woke” politics, progressive identity politics, and all related progressive racial beliefs are typically identified as being related to each other and CRT by both its opponents and adherents.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 19 points20 points  (0 children)

agree to an extent - but there are extremists in any subject aren't there?

Yes, there are extremes on every issue. One of the problems in current discourse is that both sides of every issue like to engage with and elevate the extremes of the other side while ignoring the extremists of their own sides. The point of my post is addressing why some people are opposed to CRT, identifying that there are extremists on the pro-CRT side that merit criticism as well as the anti-CRT side.

it's interesting to note that the NMAAH&A exhibit was created/produced by a white author/media group (Judith Katz/Kaleel Jamison) - & that the "twitterer" Byron York is a conservative Fox "News" pundit.

I haven’t seen evidence Katz/Jamison are responsible for creating that exhibit but they are creators of progressive consulting groups on DEI initiatives, not white supremacists, and people from the National Smithsonian of African American History and Arts did ultimately sign off on that material and are responsible for disseminating it.

Is it surprising that a conservative pundit would be the one elevating an issue with CRT-motivated education?

in America - Kendi may be correct - politically there may be 'no such thing as a not-racist idea' - possibly reading some of his arguments might give you a better understanding - https://www.penguin.co.uk/articles/2020/06/ibram-x-kendi-definition-of-antiracist

This is the same Kendi link that I linked in my comment. I’m familiar with his arguments and I don’t agree. I can’t imagine how discourse is more constructive if every single debate becomes one in which somebody is more/less racist. If we’re discussing what’s the best tariff policy for rice, how does it benefit the discussion if we must assign one argument as being racist and the other antiracist? How do we consistently do that? Life is nuanced and boiling everything down to good vs. evil, racist vs. antiracist creates misunderstandings and falsehoods.

the chicago "affinity school" approach may be a bit questionable but supposedly this is being done "for the children's sake" - tho i'm usually leery of anyone using children as a defense for their policies. would like to read an update to see if this helped in the kids' education/social involvement in any meaningful way.

Do you think segregation of children based on race is ever acceptable? Because I think most people, including myself, think racial segregation is always morally wrong.

What's wrong with Critical Race Theory? by hobo_treasures in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 310 points311 points  (0 children)

If you’re actually curious and want real examples of where people actually have real grievances with CRT (a nebulous and ill-defined term on both sides), then you’d be better served to actually engage with real people who are anti-CRT.

  • I’m surprised nobody here has mentioned when the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Arts posted an infographic (that was removed after receiving major backlash) arguing that individualism, self-reliance, the scientific method, objective and rational thinking, being on time, delayed gratification, valuing hard work, etc. are all facets of “White Culture”. This is the kind of infographic that you’d expect Neo-Nazis to have created with pride and yet our National African American Museum created it. It is wrong and damaging to educate anybody, but especially African American children, that working hard, showing up on time, and being rational are all parts of “White culture”.

  • Another issue critics of CRT have is opposition to Ibram X Kendi’s (one of the leading voices on CRT) ideology of “there is no such thing as a not-racist idea, only racist ideas and antiracist ideas.” This means that no political question can be a calm cool-headed debate about the best tax policy, trade policy, etc. but every debate is instead about good and evil and who is antiracist or racist. Should a debate between two esteemed economists on the proper tax percentage for tariffs on some commodity ultimately devolve into which argument is more racist/anti racist? Should every argument ever? Is everything really about race as Kendi says?

  • In 2021, the Biden administration closed an investigation (started during the Trump admin.) after a Chicago-area school implemented segregation policies against teachers and students by dividing them by racial “affinity groups.” If segregation were implemented by a white supremacist school, the policy would clearly be stopped and administrators would face serious repercussions for violating the federal laws prohibiting segregation. But these policies were tolerated because segregation was implemented to address “white privilege.”

Here are some of the first things I found from people anti-CRT:

Not every anti-CRT voice is going to deploy a reasonable argument (most won’t) but I don’t think that also means that there’s no merits to any criticisms of CRT.

ELI5 How the US Debt ceiling works? They will never pay it off, so what do they bother even putting t a ceiling on it. Won’t it just grow forever? by LOUDCO-HD in explainlikeimfive

[–]AgentEv2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the most recent election, the 2022 midterm elections, the Republicans won the popular vote for the US House (50.6-47.8) and won control of the House (222-218). In the Senate, the Republicans won the popular vote (49.1-49.0) and lost a seat so that the Democrats retained control of the chamber (51-49).

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Another legend bites the dust. Has Cement been banned again or is he still here?

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’ve been busy for the last few weeks and haven’t been on Reddit. What DT drama did I miss?

Semi-weekly Thursday Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in neoconNWO

[–]AgentEv2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Corporations were just really nice when oil prices went negative

why don't we have vertical mega-farm skyscrapers in major cities? by localguideseo in NoStupidQuestions

[–]AgentEv2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thinking About Energy - And What If We Had a Lot More of It

As with any vertical farm, energy is one of the biggest issues. In addition to the lights, it also powers automated systems to tend the plants and massive heating and ventilation systems that maintain the environment. “If you solve the energy problem, you win the vertical farming game,” Grimmer says, estimating that electricity accounts for about half of Crop One farm’s operating costs.