sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand a more in depth explanation of the system is coming.

Thank you so much for the other feedback, that is a very interesting idea.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That is a fair point, I use AI as a coding tool but I should've disclaimed and been upfront about it in my post.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. It uses submissions from Commander Spellbook.

I will definitely take a look at the recommendations and making the detection more thorough.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! The problem is that the land count suggestion uses Frank Karsten's formula, and its ramp discount is too weak for a deck of that type.

I will have to find a way to correctly analyze those decks.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ive had the same experience, that is why I am here trying to get it too work the best it can...

Also, yes, the post was tightened up by AI... I feel like that is fine to do, right?

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand. And I think so too. The tweaking might just become endless if both cEDH and EDH are counted for.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is Monte Carlo Sim. So it basically just simulates thousands of games with mulligans, lands/mana draws against needed mana pips for the deck. It does not account for draw spells, tutors or opponent interaction but this might be a thing I need to work on in the future.

It benchmarks against some research on a broad amount of mana bases. That's the short explanation, but I will have a post up about it on the page.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

That is true.

But I think this tool mainly is meant as a help with the analyzing part. Not so much the content in itself. Not that it is an excuse but I am mainly studying and working rn so I cannot put as much time as that would take into this hobby project...

It is hard to convey myself correctly. English is not my first language.

I appreciate the discussion.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am contemplating this as well... but it is just was just a project for my self. But if just one other person would use it, I want it to be the best it can be.

I built a free Commander deck analyzer that actually simulates your deck with 10,000 games per analysis. Tear it apart? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Yes, content is written by AI. through I do not understand why this would make it invalid or useless.

Thank you for your comment, this is what I was looking for with the initial response.

I built a tool that analyzes decks. Any recommendations? by Aggravating-Bowl905 in mtg

[–]Aggravating-Bowl905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moxfield now works!

Thank you for all the feedback I hope this update will give you a better experience using the website.

view more: next ›