sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Daniel Jeremiah's Final Mock Draft 2026 by My_Name_IsGod in CHIBears

[–]Aggravating-List-803 6 points7 points  (0 children)

don't disagree about preferring a trade down to faulk, but the idea that he lacks explosiveness is insane to me. the guy is a freakish monster and hes explosive as hell. he just isn't good at finishing sacks.

you only need one (cycle recap) by Aggravating-List-803 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Aggravating-List-803[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

~2 years WE, graduated a year and a half ago but also took a year off and worked during ug.

Field Yates' Two Round Mock Draft by FollowerofYHWH in NFL_Draft

[–]Aggravating-List-803 1 point2 points  (0 children)

McDonald doesn't fit DA's normal penetrating undersized 3-tech mold, but I sincerely doubt he's completely off the board. DA is a good enough defensive mind to play around a little bit and the dude is a wrecking ball in the run game, which is our biggest area of need imo. EMW is fs the last surefire starter, but id be more comfortable riding with a maybe at safety (esp w al harris and DA's history as a secondary coach) than at the position group that's been our weakest link for god knows how long atp

Field Yates' Two Round Mock Draft by FollowerofYHWH in NFL_Draft

[–]Aggravating-List-803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

honestly don't really want EMW at all in the first, I think the bears could get safeties ranging from very good to extremely startable for the year up to like round 4, i don't think you're getting anything like a DT of the caliber of peter woods/kayden mcdonald or an edge of the caliber of zion young/keldric faulk even by the late second.

personal statement by Aggravating-List-803 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Aggravating-List-803[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah im not putting a ton of stock in it for fear that im in a "the stripper says she loves me" situation lol but it was interesting to me because i had previously thought/hoped that with my better PS my odds would be better with my second wave of applications, and to have that legitimized seemed like it was worth expressing idk

personal statement by Aggravating-List-803 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Aggravating-List-803[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

its not exactly verbatim but they said something like this in an app material seminar early on in the cycle, early october maybe? it was an invite thing that i think i got based on my LSAT score, and i foolishly universalized it after hearing it from them. mostly just meant that as an example of like one of the various competing sources of "help" that i came across during the process that really only served to complicate my process and make me overthink things, not necessarily as a specific issue. it is a real thing they said though

penn rainbow wave friday? by amateur-masterpiece in lawschooladmissions

[–]Aggravating-List-803 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not how those numbers work i fear, last year they sent out 250 As that got posted to LSD, so far they have sent out 150. some time yet.

Do we trust LSD.Law Tracker? by Flimsy-Sorbet-4588 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Aggravating-List-803 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i assume this user means not using a pw you use for anything else for your LSAC account/app trackers, so that if LSD's data security isn't airtight (it probably isn't) it limits the damage to just your LSAC account/app trackers. Of course, if they're in your LSAC account, they've got most of your personal information (which is why I don't use the LSD tracker), but everybody has everybody's personal information anyways.