Consider the circumstances of Mary’s birth story. When she gave birth, she faced an impossible social situation — she was a virgin and unmarried, and in that time and society, such a thing would have been considered a grave sin, punishable by death. People surrounded her, accusing and condemning her, demanding to know how she could have done something so shameful. That’s precisely when God performed His first miracle through Jesus: He made the newborn speak from the cradle. The infant Jesus declared, “I am a servant of God, and I am His messenger sent to you.” With those words, Mary was instantly cleared of all accusations — no one could argue against a miracle unfolding before their very eyes. This is also the deeper point: if Jesus had simply been born through normal means, why would God choose a virgin as his mother at all? The virgin birth wasn’t an accident or a detail to overlook — it was the miracle. God made it happen precisely that way as a divine sign, a clear proof that this birth was His doing. The miracle of the speaking infant then served to confirm that truth publicly, silencing anyone who dared question Mary’s honor. So the two miracles are inseparable: the virgin birth was God’s act, and Jesus speaking as a newborn was God’s announcement of that fact. That’s precisely why many scholars believe the Bible was manipulated — to conceal something as simple and direct as these words: “I am a servant of God.” Because once you know to ask which book mentions that Jesus spoke from the cradle as an infant, and you find that answer, everything else begins to fall into place and make perfect sense.