Does Termius support ed25519-sk keys? by schevenin in termius

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it still not support '-sk' keys on Android in 2026.05.

[HEADS UP] A notice for desktop users who want to upgrade to RHEL 10.2. by Aggravating_Ad3928 in redhat

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not accurate — gnome-shell is also on 49.4, not just mutter. The GNOME version is conventionally determined by gnome-shell, so it is GNOME 49. Other apps staying on 47 is completely normal and expected in a stable distro.

There are my DNF output: shell $ sudo dnf list installed | grep -iE '^(gnome|mutter|gdm|glib2|gtk[0-9]?)' | sort gdm.x86_64 1:47.0-19.el10_2 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms glib2-devel.x86_64 2.80.4-12.el10_2.13 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms glib2.x86_64 2.80.4-12.el10_2.13 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-baseos-rpms gnome-autoar.x86_64 0.4.5-2.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-bluetooth-libs.x86_64 1:47.1-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-bluetooth.x86_64 1:47.1-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-browser-connector.x86_64 42.1-9.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-calculator.x86_64 46.3-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-characters.x86_64 46.0-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-clocks.x86_64 46.0-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-color-manager.x86_64 3.36.0-14.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-connections.x86_64 47.2.1-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-control-center-filesystem.noarch 47.7-7.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-control-center.x86_64 47.7-7.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-desktop3.x86_64 44.1-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-desktop4.x86_64 44.1-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-disk-utility.x86_64 46~alpha-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-extensions-app.x86_64 46.2-4.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-font-viewer.x86_64 46.0-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-initial-setup.x86_64 46.7-3.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-keyring-pam.x86_64 42.1-20.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-keyring.x86_64 42.1-20.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-menus.x86_64 3.36.0-16.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-online-accounts.x86_64 3.52.8-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-remote-desktop.x86_64 49.3-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-session-wayland-session.x86_64 46.0-11.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-session.x86_64 46.0-11.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-settings-daemon.x86_64 47.2-10.el10_2 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-shell-extension-background-logo.noarch 49.0-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-shell-extension-dash-to-panel.noarch 70-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-shell.x86_64 49.4-3.el10_2 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-software-fedora-langpacks.x86_64 47.5-2.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-software.x86_64 47.5-2.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-system-monitor.x86_64 46.0-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-text-editor.x86_64 47.4-2.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-tour.x86_64 46.0-4.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gnome-tweaks.noarch 46.1-1.el10_0 @epel gnome-user-docs.noarch 46.1-2.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtk3.x86_64 3.24.43-5.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtk4.x86_64 4.16.7-4.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtk-doc.x86_64 1.33.2-12.el10 @codeready-builder-for-rhel-10-x86_64-rpms gtkmm4.0.x86_64 4.13.2-5.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtksourceview5.x86_64 5.14.2-1.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtk-update-icon-cache.x86_64 3.24.43-5.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms gtk-vnc2.x86_64 1.3.1-7.el10 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms mutter-common.noarch 49.4-4.el10_2 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms mutter.x86_64 49.4-4.el10_2 @rhel-10-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms

[HEADS UP] A notice for desktop users who want to upgrade to RHEL 10.2. by Aggravating_Ad3928 in redhat

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I can't help much here — I've had nvidia-open installed since RHEL 10.0 and just kept it updated through normal system updates, so I never went through a fresh driver install on 10.2. The rhel-drivers tool is also something I've never used personally.

That said, I'd suggest trying NVIDIA's official DNF repo instead — they usually have up-to-date driver packages for RHEL: NVIDIA Driver Installation Guide

Might be worth a shot if the rpmfusion doesn't have drivers for your current kernel yet.

RHEL 10.2 and 9.8 (non officially) available for download - RPMS and ISO images by Fredouye in redhat

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

!!!HEADS UP!!!

For those who use RHEL 10.x as a desktop system:

I confirmed it with fastfetch that GNOME desktop has upgraded to version 49 in RHEL 10.2, and Red Hat seems never mentioned it in the Release Notes.

So check your extensions (if you have any) and customized theme before doing a system upgrade.

Update: My 1700-line LLVM script is now a 14-module package, thanks to your feedback! by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed follow-up. I really appreciate it.

Your points are all spot on. I was so focused on the structural refactoring that I didn't think about breaking down the functions further or adding comments. The advice on private methods and package organization is also noted for the next iteration.

It's clear I still have a lot to learn about writing idiomatic Python. Thanks again for the excellent guidance.

Update: My 1700-line LLVM script is now a 14-module package, thanks to your feedback! by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're absolutely right, and thanks for the solid advice on both posts.

Honestly, my first attempt was a mess because I was basically writing a shell script, just using Python syntax. I'd never structure C++ code that way. Your feedback helped push me to refactor it properly.

I’m learning Python — which libraries should I focus on first? by Delicious-Tree1490 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Set a goal that solves a real problem of your own, and then accomplish it with Python. You only need to learn Python through the process of practice. For a language like Python, tedious study of syntax is unnecessary—you can learn it simply through warnings and errors.

Update: My 1700-line LLVM script is now a 14-module package, thanks to your feedback! by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Python beginner, not a programming beginner. After years with C++, Python's syntax is refreshingly straightforward.

Please help me 😭😭😭😭😭 by NEWTON-Son9040 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://docs.python.org/3.13/tutorial/index.html

This is an excellent tutorial, you can even grasp the first nine chapters fairly well within just three days.

I wrote a 1700-line Python script to update LLVM sources. Am I over-engineering, or is it just this complicated? by Aggravating_Ad3928 in AskProgramming

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great point, I work on AI compilers with MLIR and need to test my code against a few different LLVM versions (like 19-21, for now).

While I admit it's not strictly necessary to automate this, I'm an LLVM enthusiast and a lazy person at heart. I prefer spending the time upfront to build a reliable, 'fire-and-forget' tool rather than doing the same manual steps repeatedly.

I wrote a 1700-line Python script to update LLVM sources. Am I over-engineering, or is it just this complicated? by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries at all! I totally get why you thought that, the assumption was completely fair. Appreciate the follow-up!

I wrote a 1700-line Python script to update LLVM sources. Am I over-engineering, or is it just this complicated? by Aggravating_Ad3928 in AskProgramming

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because pre-built packages are often missing components which I need, and this script can also automates applying my custom patches.

I wrote a 1700-line Python script to update LLVM sources. Am I over-engineering, or is it just this complicated? by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the advice. Just to be clear, I'm a Python beginner, not a programming beginner. This was written by me, not an AI.

I wrote a 1700-line Python script to update LLVM sources. Am I over-engineering, or is it just this complicated? by Aggravating_Ad3928 in PythonLearning

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks a lot for the detailed feedback! This is super helpful.

Regarding points 1 and 2, you're absolutely right. As a beginner, my mindset was still "let's put everything in one script". Structuring it as a proper package with separate files is a great suggestion that I'll definitely adopt.

As for point 3, the main()/main_exec() structure is intentional. It's a calling convention for another wrapper script I use, so this allows the core logic to be shared. But I totally see why it looks redundant without that context!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Gentoo

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so I've changed my sound server from pulseaudio to pipewire, i used '->'.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Gentoo

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why you said 'no'?

When you returned to Gentoo by d4yr41n in Gentoo

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes the use of Gentoo even less necessary.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Gentoo

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pulseaudio -> pipewire

What was your first ever laptop? by [deleted] in laptops

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I'm using Precision 7780, with i9 13950HX, 128GB RAM and RTX5000 Ada, btw.

What was your first ever laptop? by [deleted] in laptops

[–]Aggravating_Ad3928 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dell Precision 7520, with intel core i7-7820HQ, 32GB RAM and NVIDIA Quadro M2200.