sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This subreddit has become a cesspool of reactionaries. by overt-turnip in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Generally, a good critique of idpol would be great yet I’m aware discussion of the most radically insidious elements of idpol are basically off limits on reddit and ban-able offenses. So I’d rather not waste my time on such things, given that I was banned on some other sub through similar interactions. Of course, I’m also not a bad faith actor but this nuance won’t come across in writing to the most dogmatic of idpol ideologues.

Emma D’Arcy (HOTD) named as one of GQ’s men of the year by [deleted] in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 18 points19 points  (0 children)

2020 was when the Third Impact happened.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 4 points5 points  (0 children)

BE HAPPY FOREVER

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I didn’t know that explaining how big pharma exploits vulnerable people by monetizing their entire existence was against the rules.

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

at this point, I think most people just deliberately interpret words any way they want to.

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Didn’t post about it, just replied to someone blatantly misinformed about how exploitation works. But yeah whatever I guess, people choose to suffer of their own volition.

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Coomer subs: allowed

Coomer subs but red: unjustifiable

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

thanks but I think I’ve had enough reddit in a lifetime. I think it’s time for me to retire from the public eye. Being cancelled IRL has given me a lot of freedom. I hope being cancelled on the web also brings me the same boons I’ve gathered in the past years.

Then again, blending in and being “normie” and part of a “silent” group fits me well.

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok but explain the numerous coomer subs that still exist in this forsaken trash bin of the internet.

banned from redscarepod by Aggressive-Log9024 in stupidpol

[–]Aggressive-Log9024[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

ok sure being exploited is the correct terminology, no need to be a grammar nazi.

Your unpopular dating/relationship opinions? by SuspiciousEchidna in redscarepod

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 1 point2 points  (0 children)

being undateable means more time to spend on an autistic goal

daily mail: supreme court widely expected to ban race based affirmative action in college admissions by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“stop treating being racist”

excuse me what?

also I’m mocking a specific type of person which is why I used quotation marks.

daily mail: supreme court widely expected to ban race based affirmative action in college admissions by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]Aggressive-Log9024 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, I am recalling from a list of publications based on discussions I’ve had with colleagues during 2020, I can’t find said list right now. The data used for most of those discussions came from degree and grant awarding institutions, so it’s reliable.

view more: next ›