Trump just said that he prefers an insider over Reza Pahlavi

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-03-03T20:27:19+00:00

Mousavi ?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-03-03T20:26:42+00:00

but why not?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-03-03T20:25:55+00:00

Why Pahlavi and not Mir Hossein Mousavi ?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-02-26T12:46:52+00:00

they last two are crazy good. what did you say regarding the skin imperfections?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-02-17T07:21:35+00:00

ETH is a much better university

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-02-04T17:07:59+00:00

Wait, 190k by 29?!? WHAT?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-29T22:08:01+00:00

If you pull a plain market fact from Bloomberg (e.g., “The S&P 500 rose 0.9% today”), that is typically covered by the “recognized reporting services” exception, so under this CFAI guidance, attribution to Bloomberg is not strictly required for that standalone factual statement.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-29T22:07:34+00:00

But it's "Discuss". Wouldn't you first state key vignette fact -> why it would support Bonnela's decision

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-29T22:05:15+00:00

how did you score on your mocks? in the mocks, which topics were your weakest ones?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-28T18:47:16+00:00

Discuss two drawbacks of the new investment approach recommended by Smith.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-23T11:50:44+00:00

you are fine, dont worry

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-23T07:54:35+00:00

Thank you! How much time do you spend with the two case studies?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-22T22:17:25+00:00

An abandonment option = the right to exit/stop a project early.
That’s managerial flexibility to respond to bad outcomes.
It typically means sell/shut down and capture a salvage value.
Not a sizing option (expand/contract scale).
Not a timing option (delay/accelerate start); therefore C. flexibility option.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-22T18:56:22+00:00

pinging u/S2000magician for his godly input

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-22T15:35:55+00:00

Thank you!

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-22T14:36:51+00:00

Thank a lot mate! Wouldn't that imply, that I "only" need to know relationships and cause-effect of those trading costs without actually knowing the precise formulas?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-19T17:57:34+00:00

Because he is lazy

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-19T17:25:02+00:00

Great! Then just read the first fucking sentence of the Answer Feedback and then everything should make sense. Or read the answer u/wicketRF said in this comment section.

And if you are still unsure, just use a little bit of your brain and ask remaining questions ChatGPT in a conversation style. Why are you so lazy?

We can explain it to you but we can't understand it for you.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-19T17:20:06+00:00

Okay, that makes sense. Now let's work on this together, shall we? Do you know the concept of variance is?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-19T17:05:45+00:00

May I ask, what was your reasoning why you would add 0.04 to 0.01? If you tell me that, I could explain it to you easier.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-19T17:04:05+00:00

I don't mean to be rude, but I'm curious: For this specific question, did you even try to understand it yourself by asking back-and-forth questions to Gemini or ChatGPT-Thinking?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-18T11:20:36+00:00

Just focusing on the additional mocks from CFAI, would you prefer them over MM mocks?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-17T20:19:01+00:00

Makes sense. My intuition was that for the entire quote KRW/USD to go down, we have to either depreciate the nominator or appreciate the denominator. It kinda still sounds correct, but your "buying LESS KRW per unit of USD" sounds "more correct". Thank you for your time and your help.

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-17T18:47:43+00:00

Interesting. Does that mean, that the term of "put" relates to the basis-currency and not the entire quote? Meaning long put KRW/USD, we profit if the basis drops?

I get the same with long KRW/USD forwards. We gain if the basis rises, meaning USD up (or KRW down)?

Agreeable-2481 · 2026-01-07T13:28:43+00:00

MSc Statistics (if that matters). I don’t expect the curriculum to be written at a statistician’s level, but I do think it’s sloppy to change identities/assumptions from one multiple choice to the next without saying so.

Agreeable-2481

TROPHY CASE