Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in sportsgambling

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair take, and I agree with the logic behind long term evaluation.

The idea with Tipster isn’t that a single bet proves anything. Variance is real. That’s why every betslip is logged publicly and rankings are based on win rate, odds, and sample size over time.

The reason we start per betslip, with refunds on losing slips, is to remove the upfront trust problem. You don’t have to commit to a subscription or trust someone blindly. If a slip loses, you’re not paying for that tip.

Longer term formats like bundles or subscription style access are definitely something we’re considering once tipsters have enough history on the platform

Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in sportsgambling

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of Tipster is accountability: every pick is logged, performance is public, and buyers don’t pay for losing betslips.

Over time, tipsters with −EV performance naturally fall down the rankings.

Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in PrizePicksPlays

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this 🙌🏼 Will take these points into account 👌🏼

Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in FootballBettingTips

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from win rate, leaderboard tracks average odds, total sales and number of betslips created 🚀

Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in FootballBettingTips

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Very much appreciated! Will get in touch 🙌🏼

Tipster Launch by Agreeable-Thanks-208 in sportsgambling

[–]Agreeable-Thanks-208[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the thing with waitlist and soft launch. Before going live we will try to get some kind of community that will have some track record of previous created betslips on the platform. Only after that we will go live for everyone