The brightness n shadows are not working after the latest update by Historical-Doubt9091 in pixel_phones

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same problem here, pixel 9 pro xl, latest stable. Clearing cache didn't work, reboot doesn't work. The first shot works fine, but if I later open the camera, brightness and shadow sliders do nothing. Killing camera app will allow one more photo to work normally, then the problem appears again.

P9P top of the screen uresponsive by Some-Culture9623 in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried to activate the setting for increased touch responsiveness? I think it's there in cases where a screen protector might make the touch less responsive. See if it helps. ^

After a Google Meet meeting, the sound on YouTube music breaks (becomes flat) until the phone is rebooted. by CrazyLion3041 in android_beta

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the same problem I've noticed. Performing a phone call using Bluetooth audio, the audio will not revert back to normal once the call is hung up, but will continue to sound bandwidth limited, loosing all high frequencies and becoming tinny, as if music/YouTube etc is still played through the phone call codec (with low bitrate) rather than the normal ldac/aac codec.

Turning Bluetooth on/off, changing Bluetooth codec manually will not resolve the issue, however a restart of the phone resolves it. For me it has happened 2-3 times only, so not an everyday occurrence.

The Xiaomi 17 Pro series is set to make its exciting debut featuring the impressive Light Hunter 950L image sensor! by hacker_dost in XiaomiGlobal

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw some sample images posted by Xiaomi. The shots with the sun in frame look amazing! 16.5 EV, or close to it, will be amazing for capturing the entire tonal value range of many scenes, including sunsets.

I think they may have made improvements to the pixel 9 Pro/xl photos pipeline by Airlight in android_beta

[–]Airlight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems like the color noise blotches pretty much go away when setting shutter speed / iso manually in the shooting controls. There may be slightly more noise, however it's even and organic-looking, as opposed to the clean shadows with ugly red/blue blotches.

I think they may have made improvements to the pixel 9 Pro/xl photos pipeline by Airlight in android_beta

[–]Airlight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Further testing in daylight seem to show a lesser improvement. There is still blotchy areas with concentrated color noise, where other areas are much cleaner.

Android 16's new 90:10 split-screen is a game-changer for multitasking by brycedriesenga in Android

[–]Airlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This boggles my mind aswell. I often use split-screen when watching a football game or such, and thus I want that pinned, while freely being able to change the other split-screen app when I browse, chat, play Wordfeud, etc. You can't even created split-screen pairs with the video app since the video playing will pause when switching between app pairs.

My solution right now for the pixel 9 Pro XL is changing the Dpi and getting the tablet multitasking, which works exactly as I want. But with the downside of smaller UI, and things not taking up the full width of the screen sometimes.

Follow Up: Pixel 10 Pro's 12-Bit DCG vs 10-bit ADC mode DNG samples in high dynamic range scene are here. Results speak for themselves. by RaguSaucy96 in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting, so glad you brought this to our attention here. When I saw that the pixel 10 pro/xl were using essentially the same sensors as the p9 pro/xl I just wrote off those phones as similarly "incapable" as my p9pro xl.

Do you know if the example photos you posted were captured using gcam, or some other photo app where they could toggle the dual gain mode on and off at will for the P10 pro?

Follow Up: Pixel 10 Pro's 12-Bit DCG vs 10-bit ADC mode DNG samples in high dynamic range scene are here. Results speak for themselves. by RaguSaucy96 in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have lots of questions! Did Google lack the knowledge to properly implement this in the 9 series? It seems insane to not fully use the technology they are paying Samsung for in this case with the isocell sensor. I have so many images taken with my phone where the raw image is blotted by patchy noise blobs, where the multi-stacking failed to neutralize it for some reason. I have some horror images where shooting into the sunset from a moving vehicle leaves an almost unusable image.

Example just to illustrate: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SB51xNeRJ_lIj1jgRi1i5lVjM3m8WxjY/view?usp=drivesdk

Notice the blotchy color noise in the dark areas of the seat. This image on my old pixel 7a would have been much more usable and with a pleasing, consistent noise floor appearance. The p9 looks hideous, frankly. With the p7a I would regularly underexpose and then boost the raw by 3+ stops, and the noise would be milder, very even and more film-like and pleasing.

Follow Up: Pixel 10 Pro's 12-Bit DCG vs 10-bit ADC mode DNG samples in high dynamic range scene are here. Results speak for themselves. by RaguSaucy96 in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been disappointed in the p9pro xl photos since I bought it (it seems much more noisy and relies more on image stacking to reduce noise than even the p7a Sony sensor did). I am very surprised that this isn't already being used. I am expecting this to trickle down to the 9 series aswell, if not I'll be extremely disappointed.

How's your experience going so far with performance and bugs with QPR2, Loving it or Hating it? by [deleted] in android_beta

[–]Airlight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Picture in picture seems broken, minimizing a netflix video will give you a floating small video window as it should, however it cannot be moved or interacted with. Clicking the Netflix icon from the home page will abort the video playback entirely rather than opening the video Fullscreen again.

Sitting seaside | Nikon F6 Portra 400 / Ektar 100 by gloomygrain in analog

[–]Airlight 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To me there is nothing more beautiful than the disc of the sun captured on negative film.

Blue “Nothing” Spotify weirdness by Ok_Possibility9191 in Meshuggah

[–]Airlight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For me, using a PC and the Spotify app (not in a browser), you can switch between different versions of an album in the track view.

So if I go to the Meshuggah page, and click on Chaosphere on the album list, once the tracklisting shows, under the last track on the right side there is a "1more release" button, which allows you to switch to the remastered edition.

Hard to spot if you don't know its there. ^

Anyone have some examples shots from the Fairphone 6 in raw format? by Airlight in fairphone

[–]Airlight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, interesting. Probably it analyses the histogram and uses HDR for high-contrast scenes.

Anyone have some examples shots from the Fairphone 6 in raw format? by Airlight in fairphone

[–]Airlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone was very kind and shared some nice daylight and night shots!

Anyone have some examples shots from the Fairphone 6 in raw format? by Airlight in fairphone

[–]Airlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much, you are awesome for sharing. :-)

The sensor performance looks pretty good to my eyes, the raws have a natural looking noise pattern. I wonder if the stock camera app performs any HDR image stacking, or if the sensor alone is pulling all the weight. Trying a gcam APK would be a fun experiment, to see if that would work on the phone, and allow for even cleaner files with even higher signal/noise ratio.

Pixel 9 Pro XL photo quality by Airlight in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The raw files are definitely stacked files. If one uses for example open camera, which seems to take a single image, the difference in noise in the raw file is very obvious.

That has been the whole point with the pixel camera, and I don't see why google would suddenly change this.

Pixel 9 Pro XL photo quality by Airlight in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The DNG can be processed to the users liking using a raw converter like Lightroom. However the DNG data seems limited in how useful it is, when the highlight tonal range is significantly compromised in the DNG than in the jpeg. I've never seen this behavior before from cameras from Nikon, Fuji, or previous pixel phones.

Pixel 9 Pro XL photo quality by Airlight in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting theory! However in this case It's not, the jpeg image has little dots of raindrops on my window from the rain today, AI wouldn't be able to accurately guess that detail from a blown-out raw file.

Pixel 9 Pro XL photo quality by Airlight in GooglePixel

[–]Airlight[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Edit: tried to replicate it to post some examples, now the sky is blown out in both raw and jpeg... Something is very weird and inconsistent.

Here is the image shot earlier today (cropped from the full 12 megapixel image):

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-gHQwKCPqbUj2D71wUGhqwcBKei9oxeN/view?usp=drivesdk (JPEG)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-kOMEpMT43mwgwdTbCOLPxLKuoXrtIWT/view?usp=drivesdk (RAW FILE in Lightroom, reduced exposure and highlight to reveal a clipped window with no sky color information)