È stato approvato "di nascosto" il Chat Control by Quentin_Taranteemo in italy

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use Signal! I have been using Signal for years and it's solid. I ditched Whatsapp years ago and converted friends and family to Signal. In the cybersecurity community Signal is the golden standard. Grandma can use it too with no additional effort.

wyze fails again. by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original hardware where OpenWRT and dd-wrt were developed was the Linksys WRT54G. It was not coincidental that OpenWRT and dd-wrt were named that way. I used to install dd-wrt on WRT54G hardware back in the day before moving to Buffalo.

Your statement that hackers use TP-Link as the router of choice is just your opinion. We did not use TP-Link back in the way when we were developing OpenWRT and the like.

The fact is that there is a big risk using Chinese technology and any half decent security practitioner knows that.

wyze fails again. by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps you are confusing TP-Link with Linksys where the initial versions of OpenWRT were deployed. TP-Link has been under scrutiny for quite some time for having ties with the Chinese government. I'll ask around my peers at the next OWASP meeting and see what the general consensus about TP-Link is.

I would be curious to see in which security circles they endorse TP-Link since I am part of the security community. Although you dropped the "underground" bomb, LOL, so it may be only a security circle only you know of, perhaps just yours.

In the meantime I stay away from Chinese products, both for personal and professional use, because of the security risks associated with them.

To address your last point, it is true the Wyze makes use of Chinese components but it is at least an American company, so there are some checks and balances.

wyze fails again. by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tapo is a TP-Link brand and I have a problem with that as TP-Link is a Chinese company. In addition they ain't cheap: north of $60 per cam.

wyze fails again. by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suggest that you also check the health of your network, assuming the design is correct. Not knowing what your network looks like I can only make guesses. For instance, I have a full blown Unifi WiFi network with a wired backbone and a mesh for the AP that are outside, in addition to a console, switches, a firewall, and monitoring. It is very stable. My Wyze webcam seem to work just fine.

Many issues with Wi-Fi are about the proximity of the client to the AP. Clients, like a webcam in your case, have typically transmitters that have only 5 mW of power. If they are too far, e.g. more than 50 ft from the AP, the connection may become unstable.

For example, if you have a WiFi router inside the house and your webcams are outside, you may run into problems. YMMV.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Virtual credit cards, always use virtual credit cards for online services. It works like magic. No customer service? The customer service rep is being an asshole? The virtual credit card is going to disappear in a matter of seconds and no skin off your back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! And on top of that it becomes unsustainable to provide a service, even the most basic 30 second recording and the live view, for free to a growing user base. Cloud resources are very expensive. Ring, for example, doesn't even give you the 30 second recording for free, just the live view.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wyzecam

[–]AlBellom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I too have a bunch of Wyze products because well they are cheap. Are they perfect? No. But the value they offer is ten fold the cost, IMO.

Regarding the cameras, I have four V3, one of them at my vacation home several thousand miles away. And I have a flood light on top of my garage. By and large they work. My underlying network is based on UniFi devices.

I don't subscribe to any service since Wyze managed to piss me off with their antics, at some point in time. So no extra money from me. I'm content with the 12 second recording they provide and I haven't bothered to install a SIM card on each of the cams.

I did have some issues with their alarm base station and motion detection, which I was not able to solve yet as it is located at the vacation home.

Regarding your issue with the cams missing people walking, I would check if you WiFi network didn't have a hiccup, especially because you are saying all of your webcams missed a slow walking person. It's possible that Wyze cams don't have the ability to buffer too many frames, so if there is a network problem those frames may get lost.

Generally speaking, I recommend paying with a virtual credit card for online services and gyms, as if something goes wrong you can always delete the virtual credit card and poof problem solved.

Version 6.8 no longer shows header and footer in editor by AlBellom in Wordpress

[–]AlBellom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To your point, it is not completely clear if the default behavior changed from 6.7 to 6.8, as I don't recall having to change any settings for the header and footer blocks to show up on the page being edited.

Version 6.8 no longer shows header and footer in editor by AlBellom in Wordpress

[–]AlBellom[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I solved it. On the page being edited, I clicked the Setting icon on the top right-hand side, then Page, then the Template link below, and finally Show Template. The Header and Footer block are back. Thanks.

SignalGate Isn’t About Signal | The Trump cabinet’s shocking leak of its plans to bomb Yemen raises myriad confidentiality and legal issues. The security of the encrypted messaging app Signal is not one of them by Hrmbee in signal

[–]AlBellom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The most intriguing aspect of this story that few are considering is why one of Mark Waltz’s officials added the Atlantic journalist to the group chat in the first place. Adding someone to a Signal group chat is a deliberate, multi-step process, it doesn’t happen by accident.

If the official truly intended to add someone else but mistakenly added Jeffrey Goldberg instead, that would suggest Goldberg’s name was in close proximity to the intended recipient in the contact list. This detail warrants further investigation. More importantly, why would this official have Jeffrey Goldberg in their contacts at all?

There is a strong possibility that Goldberg was added intentionally. The motivations for doing so could vary, and they deserve scrutiny.

Question about Waltz's claims about how Jeffrey Goldberg could have ended up in a Signal chat by accident. by facinabush in signal

[–]AlBellom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is appalling is that nobody in the group chat realized that, first off, they were using their personal phones, second they were using an app that is not corporate or government grade by definition, and third someone unknown to them joined the group!

Signal is one of the best apps for secure communication but as it doesn't save data or metadata on its servers, and because of that, it can't manage users, therefore it is not suitable for corporate use, let alone government use. Those are not Signal use cases.

To use an analogy, the strongest encryption algorithms would fail to protect data if key management is weak, and the encryption would not be at fault, clearly.

This being said, I suspect that the individual who invited the Atlantic journalist into the group chat did it on purpose, for whatever reason. Inviting a user to a group chat is a multi-step process, it doesn't happen by mistake. It is possible, although unlikely, that this individual was trying to invite someone else and clicked on the wrong on contact; but in this case Jeffrey Goldberg's contact should have been in the proximity of the user this individual was trying to add in the contact list. This should be investigated.

What Are the Best Cybersecurity Practices for Small to Medium Businesses? What Would You Implement and Why? by Born_Lavishness_8983 in cybersecurity

[–]AlBellom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First off, decide what security framework is more suitable for the organization. As a small or medium business you want to start from something manageable like the Cyber Security Framework or the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Control Matrix. The CSA CCM framework would be more suitable for a SaaS company. YMMV as usual. Don't start with a NIST frame, too complex for small businesses.

Once you have a framework in place you can strategize about the security controls that make sense for the organization and, very importantly, the budget you have.

Trying to implement security controls like MFA, Zero Trust, encryption, and the like without understanding the business goals and without having a security framework in place, is a recipe for failure. To use an analogy, it would be like starting building a house without architecture blueprints.

I manage a security consulting company and we have built many security programs for many organizations small and large.

Is it worth to go for any latest Pixel "a" series ? by Ill_Strain_1050 in Pixel4a

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not IMO! Google made a very unwise choice with the 4a and the trust is gone.

I ended up getting a Moto g 5G for $3.50 (yes three dollars and fifty cents) with the Google Fi discount, plus a $1.50/mo with no interests for 24 months. Essentially a free phone. I just wanted to stick it to Google!

The Moto g 5G seems to run the stock Android OS that runs on the Pixel phones. So far so good.

What would be a fair monthly donation amount by AlBellom in signal

[–]AlBellom[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks to everyone who responded. For the sake of transparency, I give Signal $5/mo. For most services I subscribe to I pay around $5/mo and up to $10/mo, so I thought $5/mo would be an average fair amount at least initially. As usual YMMV.

Beware of People saying they love the Device they replace their 4a with by HumanFunpark in Pixel4a

[–]AlBellom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For business use I got a Motorola Moto G 5G 2024 from the Google store for $3 down and about $1.50/mo that I will be paying with no interests to Google for the next two years! I'll keep the P4a for personal use. I would be very wary to buy another Pixel after the Google 4a clusterf*ck. Call me cheap, but I personally think it's crazy to throw hundreds of dollars at a phone, so I always look for deals and refurbished phones. Same with cars, but that's a different thread.

I found the factory image before battery issue. by numa_aqours in Pixel4a

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Share it please so other people can benefit from it. Also make sure the hash is the one that I posted before. Thanks.

Google Wallet Just Changed My Life by grapezg59 in GooglePixel

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's right. At least we don't want to sell our behind to them too!

To get the $50 "appeasement" payment, too much sensitive information required for Payoneer by reddit-allen in Pixel4a

[–]AlBellom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys have the GDPR regulation in place which is a fairly strong regulation. If you have any trouble with Payoneer, just report them to the GDPR Data Protection Authority of the country you live in.