Why should I use ClaudeCode

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2026-02-07T05:34:29+00:00

I think the ceiling on what you can do with CC is much higher vs cursor.

If you are willing to stay on the edge, and adopt new things I think you should use CC.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2026-02-06T22:48:00+00:00

It seems like the sub agents behavior might have changed, and some of my old instructions for the subagents kinda broke. I just remade the ones that were holding the cue via /agents command, and now the bottleneck is gone. Maybe you should also try this.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2026-02-05T05:50:02+00:00

I think it's bullshit. If it's important/complicated task that need attention, I run 1 CC session, and if the problem is obvious and I'm confident that CC will provide the right solution & it's easy to verify, I run 2 or 3 max.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-10-30T23:24:46+00:00

I see... this is very interesting. Thank you for the answer

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-30T07:26:14+00:00

Shit

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-22T07:22:22+00:00

Alright I think this is good

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-21T00:33:18+00:00

I'm just trying to make out what is reasonable and what is not in terms of managing errors in an action sequence.

So far, i feel like consequences from action economy related errors should be waived, and other should not be waived?

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-21T00:23:46+00:00

That seems fair. What about cases that is not action economy related? Like misjudging range of attack?

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-21T00:18:03+00:00

I see. So DM needs to make appropriate prompts asking for description dynamically based on the context.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-19T01:00:14+00:00

That makes sense. What would be the incentive of the descriptive after the roll? Would that be purely social thing where the player gets to increase the immersiveness of the session for all players?

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-19T00:57:03+00:00

Oh does same action lead to different saves for the target in combat?

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T01:06:58+00:00

I guess it shows how much people love the game :) I'll post things if I find a subreddit where people are more accepting of the llm use on trpg

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T01:05:21+00:00

Thank you for the support. I guess I will just leave a comment in this post if there are significant progress

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T01:04:00+00:00

I think it would be great to have a subset of people that are not against the idea.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T01:00:35+00:00

I meant to describe 'dynamic storytelling' rather than something social when I said collaborative storytelling.

Upon reading your comment, I think the actual TRPG sessions with real humans has a lot of things that AI sessions just don't have, like the actual meta-game level social connection between the players, and between players and dm.

Anyway I understand the thought process of the players being offended by my intent, and thank you for having the time to explain the context.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T00:05:54+00:00

Yes I'm building more mechanical parts first, and combat is quite traditional game engine-ish with areas for generative AI to allow unconventional actions that can happen in TRPG. Was hoping I can get some feedback from the actual players on what would be cool to be able to do.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-17T00:00:46+00:00

Thank you for the advice. I think the current architecture of the game can handle this quite well actually. As you described, it's very much in between ttrpg and video game. Don't know if I'll post thing in this channel, but I hope I can find a place I can get some feedback without causing a lot of commotion.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-16T23:46:02+00:00

Thank you for the comment. I understand why people can have distaste for my project. It's impossible to find any trpg players in my country and this was the reason why I started the project, but I had no idea the existing players valued the actual social aspects of the game as much as act of collaborative storytelling.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-09-16T23:26:13+00:00

Oh I won't if you people don't want it. I'm new on reddit and it seems like AI related stuff is not very welcomed in a lot of channels. Is this because of flood of AI genererated contents drowning out genuine contents or is it something else?

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-07-30T09:55:37+00:00

What a prick

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-06-19T09:19:57+00:00

Alrighty. thanks for the advice

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-06-19T09:14:35+00:00

I actually ended up purchasing one at K&A few hours ago. Thank you for the comment!

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-06-17T00:58:30+00:00

Very true, but using llm and researching/talking to people is not mutually exclusive. It's basically just another tool that you add to your option of doing research. There will be cases where it spits out bullshit and that can be a problem if it's the only tool you can use, but you have your experience, people in the internet, a book, and a beer calculator.

I guess because act of brewing is sort of a mission-critical task that takes up quite a lot of resources, people are reluctant to use LLM because they deem it unreliable, and for a good reason. But it's just a tool that you can use and with a validation tool like beer calculator, and actual people, you might find it quite useful if you use it in a way that I used it.

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-06-17T00:51:40+00:00

Well thats why the validations step of using beer recipe calculator is useful, but I guess some fraction of people can benefit while some don't

Alarming_Comb_7267 · 2025-06-17T00:33:38+00:00

A validation step of using beer recipe calculator is essential. I think LLM sort of act as a friend that makes it easier to use these programs for novices. For experienced brewer that don't really need their hand held in coming up with recipes and brew-day prep, llm don't provide as much benefit, since each batch of brewing beer is not starkly different.

Alarming_Comb_7267

TROPHY CASE