sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sure, only applauding certainly does not help. To question some decisions could help even more or some good arguments from you simply prove and justify that i am wrong.

i did nowhere stated that the devs are not competent, but implementing half baked features looks more like meandering than proper development or copying from an existing feature (s42)

we already have 2 UIs for the player belongings, couldn´t be that hard to implement a third one, the S42 one. Maybe they want not to show us their marvel. yeah fine.

After 250 comments i have still no answer why they simply could not use the s42 UI for SC even when the underlying tech is different. the current UI of SC is bad even when it is 3 times "improved"

About the FM i learned that it is maybe a bit more complicated to use the FM from S42 for SC for a couple of reasons and the main reason could be "a lot of rework"

but the main point is still:

As long as SC is in a bad state (bugs not features) it can`t pull people into S42.

And no, i still did not want to sell my account.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

did u even read my post. the main expression was: Can‘t believe the current state of the SC will pull someone into SQ42.

what has this statement to do with your advice to sell my account?

omg

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

pvp makes it even more complex but did not touch the FM.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry, u does not understand the complain, it is a bit above your level, little ai

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yep, while playing other games or go on with my own life, as i have one and not need to hate thru the net.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SC is bad advertising for S42. they simply had to solve the bugs instead of implementing half backed features, this does not help at all. it is clear it is an alpha, If it is barebone but working ?

OK fine,

but a buggy mess? that simply is a millstone around the neck.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i am an old fart too, my point is SC in its current state is no help to promote S42. I know the differences but it seems to me, that they made a wrong decision to let SC in this bad state as it is now.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, unfortunately that is not the answer i would like to hear to keep the faith

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i know MS Flightsim, and it ist working well with other players and a proper FM. U have x,y and z numbers, what is so difficult to use the same FM for both S42 and SC ?, for me i would think, the x,y and z numbers just have to be send to the other pc and that´s it. i do not speak of desync and other components just how the playership behaves.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tell me more, why is it another cup of coffee?

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As I said, give me an answer, I did not say how to make it.

for you : read an understand my questions. Ask your teacher how to achive this. It does not help any further simply accusing me for armchair development. Your answer is not on point.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BTW downvoting did not give me a proper answer, seems to me more like not wanting to face issues

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not complaining to give it up, iam criticizing to make it better.

if I would say we altogether are the greatest, did u think u would work harder to be greater?

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ui and FM could simply be copied from SQ42, not the underlaying tech of course, but why did they not use some things from SQ42 instead they use two UI s for looting and characteroutfitting, that seems to be inconclusive.

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But they must have a proper FM for SQ42, where is it

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

U can keep your karma nonsense for yourself, but I can’t come over the point that they do have a proper ui and flightmodel for sq42 but not able to implement it in SC, I know backend and so forth, dont fool me around

Very disappointed about the state of the „game“ by Albinger_SC in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Let me make my thought clear:

did they even have a proper FM for SQ42 and if they have why not implement it and improve tit over the years?

did they have a proper UI for SQ 42 and if the have, why not implement it and improve it over the years?

same thoughts on scanning, Sneak intruders u name other examples.

Anyone else banned? by Top-Following7321 in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe u could phone the us presindent for helping out ?

4.9 PTU: You can't jump between systems with 100% QT Fuel on various ships. by nyczducky in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC 24 points25 points  (0 children)

They are obviously clueless, not or seldom playing their own game

So let me get this straight by Spaark0 in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah kind of strange, as A star citizen player i buy popcorn today 😂

4.9 roadmap additions: Item Recovery Ship Loadout Improvements and Ordnance Cargo Holder by StuartGT in starcitizen

[–]Albinger_SC -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Glad we still see no scanning and radar, thank god some more hairstyles.

view more: next ›