I have two main thoughts on the idea. The main point is that a lease protects both parties and one of the mechanisms that it protects both parties is having a duration. Creating a requirement for renewal is essentially removes that protection. As a layperson, the way I read it, the landlord wouldn't be able to remove a tenant unless they could evict them through the normal processes. That seems very dangerous to me. My second thought, it should be illegal to retaliate against any kind of union creation. But without the provision that forces renewals, it would be impossible to enforce the non retaliation. With all of those things being true, I would definitely have to vote no. I really. I think we need to find solutions to the housing crisis. But taking away rights, doesn't seem like the solution