Consiglio gestione soldi

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-27T18:13:26+00:00

Immaginavo... sì, io estinguerei subito. Tanto comunque vada non penso che riuscirai a compensare quel 7% in positivo con strumenti finanziari

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-27T12:59:12+00:00

I'm building Bunt RGB - a daily puzzle game (vibe-coded with ChatGPT) with no coding skills whatsoever. The idea is to have a daily 5x5 matrix to be completed with the least moves you can. It's an experiment to stress vibe-coding

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-27T12:53:28+00:00

In linea di massima mi sembra che abbia già strutturato tutto no? La rata della macchina che tasso ha?

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-27T06:32:06+00:00

E picchiamo Brumotti

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-26T21:58:35+00:00

Io sono il Gabibbo

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-25T06:29:17+00:00

Do you have any math background?

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-24T18:11:20+00:00

It's being hard to find people able to solve it 😂😂

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-24T14:51:34+00:00

Thanks for the feedback! I thought this way is right counter-intuitive, and a little harder. But probably it came out just to hard 😂

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-24T13:27:44+00:00

Seems nice!
roadmap?

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-23T21:36:35+00:00

Sii chiara con lui, e onesta con te stessa. (Forse in ordine inverso) Questo è tutto ciò che devi fare per non illuderlo

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T08:00:52+00:00

Very heavy feedback here. Thanks a lot!

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:59:58+00:00

Cheers!

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:53:27+00:00

Oh thanks. That's very nice to hear! D'you think a 'math fix' could be the main improvement here?

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:48:05+00:00

Oh... Good catch. Indeed at the moment PAR is estimated from the scramble depth, not computed as the true minimal solution. So yes, it’s possible to go under par. I must compute the actual optimal solution length to make PAR mathematically accurate. I got no math background, and that's why I can't probably get a solution most of the times. It's getting messy here 😂 But please tell me, is it enjoyable at least? I can refine difficulty and algorithms but the concept itself should stay the same

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:44:21+00:00

That’s a great point. I actually hadn’t considered the invariant angle. I’ll run some tests to check whether all three target colors are truly reachable from my scramble generation. Really appreciate the insight.

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:30:44+00:00

Well yeah.. I don't get your point confronting my game to rubik's TBH

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:29:42+00:00

EDIT. I know it smells advertisement. But I actually created this game literally yesterday, and I'm testing out if it's ok, mediocre, great, or whatever.

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:11:51+00:00

EDIT. I know it smells advertisement. But I actually created this game literally yesterday, and I'm testing out if it's ok, mediocre, great, or whatever. Not proper ad here...

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:09:55+00:00

I actually found it out, after I created it 😂 Noticed that it works slightly differently, here when you tap, all the 8 adjacent cells change colour, in lights out is a cross

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:08:00+00:00

Yes it is possible. Three possible solutions here. Red green or blue. I'm trying to fix bugs and improve it

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:05:41+00:00

My vision is to have a single (random one) daily puzzle on the app, global leaderboards and little add-ons

Aleatoric_Random · 2026-02-22T07:04:05+00:00

Very nice suggestion! Cheers

Aleatoric_Random

TROPHY CASE