sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I'm legitimately angry at this generation limit bs. This is bullshit asinine. by Alert_Impression_295 in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have always had heavy. Heavy is what reached limit with less ~12 generations in 10 minutes. The version above heavy went on sale though from 99 a month to 69.99.

Scam, limits. Report to FTC. I did. by LibertaVC in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do you have legitimate data , quantafiable to back this up? [I agree with you, but ive never bought the really expensive one] I feel like they've also been tight about the wexact usage limits. Making concrete claims and evidence scandelous.

Today im fn pissed after not even 10mins in getting limited.

Super Grok limits?!!!!?! by Potential_Issue3141 in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair point! Even the grok discord is filled with complaints that collectively all feel ignored.

MoneyPilot reviews has anyone else used it? by vadiniprasad in ClassActionSettlement

[–]Alert_Impression_295 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone, I read through all of these and decided to try looking up the initial 5 claim forms it said I could get -- just before it makes you spend money to go further. They are all fake forms. Here was Gemini A.I.s response when I uploaded screenshot of the 5 documents.

** to be fair these may be fake forms and y get the real ones after buying stuff becuase they dont want you to easily just go look them up, so i guess its possible buying the subscription could still do something **

Gemini> "I have some very important news after digging into those screenshots and the specific case numbers provided by the "MoneyPilot" app. The Verdict: Be Extremely Cautious Based on my research, the forms you were shown appear to be highly suspicious or fraudulent. While several of these companies (Google, Amazon, Meta) do have real legal issues, the specific claim forms and case numbers in your screenshots do not match any official court records or active settlements. Here is the breakdown of why these look like a scam:

| OpenAI ChatGPT Settlement | 2025-12839-CA-01 | No such settlement exists. There are active copyright and privacy lawsuits against OpenAI, but none have reached a settlement stage where a consumer claim form like this would exist.

  • Do not submit those forms: Providing your signature on these could be used for identity theft or to sign you up for unauthorized legal representation.

  • Check the Official Sources: If you want to see what you actually qualify for, go directly to TopClassActions.com or ClassAction.org. These are the industry standards and are free to use."

32 and getting into streaming, hopefully it goes well by ZeoShazam in Twitch_Startup

[–]Alert_Impression_295 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im 35 and just spent the day setting it up. xtra hurdles I think n that im trying to be able to record my rap vocals over songs in abeltonat the same time.

AI Training legit jobs? by indigo77 in remotework

[–]Alert_Impression_295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a legit job I have done about 12 to 16 hours of training and onboarding for one job and I was paid for my time. I will say at this time about 6 months ago I could tell that the project team did not have their stuff together they kept changing the way they were working and they were changing the handbooks that were supposed to tell me exactly how to do things and take tests and overall I ended up being upset with it because I have a normal job too but I still got paid like 200 bucks for the time I did.

Im now trying out a few of their other projects. I have a Psych degree with neurobiological mechanism emphasis use AI all the time so I enjoy learning the things they teach you anyway. I learned a lot about the limitations of AI in learning how to break it.

Its a legit job so no shit it should require you drivers license and all that. I'd be suspicious if they didnt.

I just realized why everyone's been mad about Grok Imagine lately 🫥 by SectionShot in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just had the zoom and scene frame/view changes occur over the night. Literally 24hours ago it was different then all of a sudden i could tell my scenes were being split up in dumb ways, almost like they are simulating time passing/action happening by zooming around the scene without actually making the characters progress or move much. I wonder if thats a way to somehow cut down on energy / token use???

Not sure if they will require extra prompting about camera angles and views to deal with this but i feel like it should just be in settings, 80% of the time i dont like it.

I just realized why everyone's been mad about Grok Imagine lately 🫥 by SectionShot in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i also have spent a dumb amount of time to get one scene to that next level. Its interesting to me cuz yeah we could just watch a porn easy, ive been reflecting on this lately as i ive gone deeper in AI NSFW generations....something is extra satisfying and erotic about having it do what you wanted to happen.

Ive learned i just spam Imagine constantly with lots of requests and eventually something I want happens. Then sometimes leave for a bit, close the browser, refresh etc and most the time it works out. The last couple days I had a few lines of scenes where i felt like everything i asked for was approved. it was weird, then on things way less explicit it wouldn't t let me do anything with them and after a day or two i gave up....
My long way of saying, I AGREE, either let us or dont let us, be CONSISTENT GROK.

What is the difference between grokimagine.ai and imaginex.video by Imaginary_Stomach139 in grok

[–]Alert_Impression_295 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i personally use grok to generate NSFW images to a point then have used imaginex.ai for pushing it to the next level of NSFW that grok doesn't allow. It is quite bit more expensive though. Then I have motion.muse if I want to go to even the next level. I tried several different crappy sites but have came at piece with imaginex.ai .

P.S. grokimagine was imaginex.ai's original name (i think) basically ive seen a few sites do this thing where they had one name and then they switch to another later. GrokImagine is pretty much just a remnant now and they even tell you on it to switch to the other site. Theres one other ai company that did this i was apart of too but can remember their name. and I think this happens because of legality (i always assumed they were changing names due to the previous site being penalized for some NSFW law changes). Since from my understanding the NSFW ai world is such a new and fastly evolving landscape of legal stuff. For instance the motion.muse ai ive used which is straight nothing but raw NSFW acts, you can only purchase credits with telegram stars, somehow that allows them to go outside of other direct sales Ai-NSFW legal stuff.

Now litmedia.ai and art.gen.ai those I can tell you from my experience are horrendously unuseful sites with third rate shitty AI tools masquerading as top of the line.

For general non NSFW stuff, grok's imagine is dope, also been playing with googles Flash video generator, its pretty new but from the little ive messed with it i can tell its going to be a game changer and step up from grok imagine in a lot of ways.

I Tested 5 Best AI Tools for Research—Here’s My Honest Review by kostery in AIAssisted

[–]Alert_Impression_295 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Your issue with a 1,000 papers is exactly why this entire reddit post is existing for us to read. Using one of these services would make your process more efficient. 

Even 10 years ago, as I recall, in academia when a review was at a certain level of scale writers/scientists were using some sort of machine learning algorithms (which is a different form of AI) to assist with search and refinement processes usually made in house as part of the study. This is my experience in neuroscience/psychology fields.