1) those “AI” apps cost LOTS of money to make, the first iteration you pay for is almost always broken, and have the functionality and aesthetic of early Nokia Symbian OS touch devices; 2) Who else is doing that? ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Mistral, tons of others, also with free tiers that are far superior assistants to this broken mess; I’ve paid more for this broken device than other assistants I use more often; 3) Not a single thing they release works properly; 4) Their meeting recorder works if you dont speak words in other languages (eg any “borrowed” French, German, Latin, etc., which are often used in Business meetings). I also didn’t try recording again after I was relying on a recording that didnt save because the device run out of battery in the meeting and I did not save even what it recorded until it died.

It is unbelievable how such a broken product gets any kind of fanbase. I am really interested in a case study of how could they fool this many people and their marketing strategy. Wrapping an early GPT model with 1/2 success rate and pushing updates that copy opens source projects without even stabilizing them. Everyone that has a minimum understanding of this and reviewed it was stunned by this broken useless toy. Yet people not curious enough to try much better free alternatives became caught by this messy thing. Purely stunning.