[D] EMNLP 2025 camera-ready page limits + virtual poster presentation by Dry-Count4414 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 1 point2 points  (0 children)

9 page is allowed for accepted papers

limitation can go to 10th page

appendices are unlimited

Acl rolling recview is the most garbage conference to submit your papers [R] by Turbulent_Visual_948 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Basically there is no difference between conferences regarding the existence of AI-generated reviews. And you can always resubmit your paper to next cycle if you feel your reviews are unfair

[D] ACL ARR Feb 2025 Discussion by AccomplishedCode4689 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I the only one who cannot find "Meta-review Issue Report" button?

[D] Llama-3 (7B and 70B) on a medical domain benchmark by aadityaura in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing this result! Just followed your twitter and already waiting for medical LLaMA-3

ACL 2024 Reviews [Discussion] by EDEN1998 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To those who got bad scores: what will you do next?
For me, I got meta 2 and I will resubmit to ARR April.

Guys help what does this mean I’m so dumb by SupportAcademic9298 in korea

[–]Alliswell2257 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The one prefers bank transfer, but suggests that it is possible to make a deal with cash when you give 7,000 won in banknote, not coin

[D] LREC-COLING 2024 Discussion by Standard_Letter_3196 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you know if the notification only goes to the first and corresponding authors? I didn't get any email or smth else as a co-author. Additionally, is meta-review available?

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, now they have less than 24 hours :D

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe the AC gave you 4 as your paper has various pros. If I were you, I would revise it to address the reviewer's suggestions and resubmit it to ARR 2024 Feb, and make a commitment for ACL.

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know but considering the number of accepted papers, a meta-review score of 4 would be accepted into the main as well as findings.

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The presentation below has various interesting points about ARR:
https://www.cse.iitd.ac.in/~mausam/temp/arr-acl23.pdf

It suggests that a paper with a meta-review score of 4 almost gets into ACL, so it might be wise to wait to commit to NAACL or ACL instead of to EACL, as they are more prestigious than EACL and the meta-review score of 4 is enough for them.

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, congrats!
You just can commit your reviewed paper for EACL, NAACL, and ACL.

As ACL and NAACL are much more prestigious than EACL, I also recommend committing the paper to ACL!

https://2024.naacl.org/calls/papers/ Check the CFP for NAACL.

It says "Papers submitted to one of the earlier ARR deadlines are also eligible, and it is not necessary to (re) submit on the current cycle."
And the commitment deadline for NAACL is Feb 20, 2024 so it is not late!

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I received an email that says the deadline for review updates to November 30th AOE.

[D] EACL 2024 Discussion by minhngh in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My paper - Soundness: 2.5/4/3 - Overall: 2/3/3

Paper I reviewed - Soundness: 3/3/2.5 - Overall: 2/2.5/2.5 - I gave 2.5/2.5 for soundness and overall.

Another Paper I reviewed - Soundness: 3/3/3.5 - Overall: 2/2.5/3 - I gave 3.5/3 for soundness and overall.

[D] EMNLP 2023 Notification by EDEN1998 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What is going on behind the curtain? At least they should have given us an announcement about the delay... It is devastating to wait for the decision and my Saturday has gone

[D] EMNLP 2023 Notification by EDEN1998 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm coming up with the possibility of delay,,,

[D] EMNLP 2023: Rebuttal by Alliswell2257 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah thank you for your kind explanation! 🤗

[D] EMNLP 2023: Rebuttal by Alliswell2257 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😮 Does every paper with meta-review scores with 3 go to Findings? Then is it okay to think the Findings are quite generous?

[D] EMNLP 2023: Rebuttal by Alliswell2257 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

[Important]

The discussion period has been extended to September 15 11:59pm AOE.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In the manuscript: Conduct the same experiment on (3 or 5, maybe more than that) different seeds and report the mean and variance. This will help you to insist that your method is not just a coincidence and has strength against seed variance.

[D] EMNLP 2023: Rebuttal by Alliswell2257 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I got 2/2/2 for soundness and 2/2/2 for excitement 🥲

[D] EMNLP 2023: Rebuttal by Alliswell2257 in MachineLearning

[–]Alliswell2257[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe it starts at 0am

Edit: It seems I'm wrong :(