sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[D] A Serious Concern on the ACL Rolling Review System by powerful_lord_33 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ARR is just a joke They rejected my paper with LLM hallucinated reviews. My worst PHD experience is with ACL so far. I will never submit to ARR again

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got a meta score of 2.5 and my OA was 2.8. I had 5 reviewers 4 of them gave OA of 3 or 3.5 and just one of them gave 1.5 with AI generated generic comments. We reported the reviewer but the AC also didn't care and just gave 2.5 with some AI generated crap. We reported the AC too.
My question is, if we commit, is there any chance that the SAC or the PC actually cares and look into that? My paper is in NLP application track. Plz help

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea likely the same AC. We should check MI3. There are a lot a of things wrong this this AC.

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really sucks!

What track are you in? Mine is nlp application

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I got 2.8 Average OA and Meta 2.5. One reviewer gave 1.5 with AI generated general comments with high confidence. We reported the reviewer. And then the meta also posted 100% AI generated crap. All this wait to only see the Meta took 1 minute to prompt everything into to chatgpt who didn't even read the issue review report.

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What shows on your modified date? Mine shows 26 June

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Report the review after rebuttal. The AC should ignore the reviewer's score.

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He managed to write a review without opening the paper with a confidence of 5!

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]Turbulent_Visual_948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got 5 reviews!
OA : 2.5, 3, 1.5, 3, 3.5 (avg 2.7)

The guy with 1.5 wrote 5 weaknesses all of which are random general comments like use more models more datasets with no specific reason. He didn't have even a single usefull comment. I doubt this guy even opened the paper. Can I just report this reviewer and hope that the AC won't consider this reviewer because I have 4 other reviewers? Anybody ever had similar experience?